TYB - nice work.
Who decides what's notable?
Discussion from lb -
>>15530829 pb
>The rules are:
>Baker takes notables.
>If anon challenges notable baker takes it out
>Been that way forever.
No always. Depends on what is said and the arguments/sauce given. Shills screamed when wearethene.ws was first notabled.
>>15530867 pb
>Unless I see the rules in writing and I hear it directly from BO or Bakers have been given instructions, I don't believe a free speech board is run this way
There are no instructions about what sources are ok and which are not.
There can be guidelines but it's still gonna be a matter of discernment and baker's choice.
Anons can give feedback if they really don't like a source (with a reason) but then there are sources some like and some don't.
In the end, each baker will make his own decision. Best when they dialog w/anons a little, but not possible in fast breads.
Most of the time, that approach works fine.
Anons can always repost.
Diggers do it all the time.