‘A Menace to Public Health’: Doctors Demand Spotify Puts an End to Covid Lies on ‘Joe Rogan Experience’

Unlike many platforms, Spotify doesn’t have a clear policy prohibiting misinformation. 270 physicians and scientists are hoping to change that

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/covid-misinformation-joe-rogan-spotify-petition-1282240/

An Open Letter to Spotify: A call from the global scientific and medical communities to implement a misinformation policy

https://spotifyopenletter.wordpress.com/2022/01/10/an-open-letter-to-spotify/

Majority of ‘270 doctors’ who signed letter demanding Spotify take action against Joe Rogan are not medical doctors

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10418589/Most-270-signed-anti-Joe-Rogan-letter-demanding-Spotify-action-not-actually-doctors.html

Minnesota doctors join campaign to censor Joe Rogan

https://alphanews.org/minnesota-doctors-join-campaign-to-censor-joe-rogan/

"Joe Rogan has discouraged vaccination in young people and children, incorrectly claimed that mRNA vaccines are “gene therapy,” promoted off-label use of Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 (contrary to FDA warnings)."~~ per letter signed by 270 people, but many are NOT doctors to begin with.

This is laughable, the mRNA gene therapy jab is NOT a vaccine, never had FDA full approval before late 9/2021 (not that ‘FDA approved’ means shit anyway).

No long term effects ever studied, first mRNA injected into humans.

And how ironic by granting full approval, the FDA cleared the way for more agencies, companies & fed gov to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations. (Just think of the $$$profits that maneuver will bring in for Pfizer's mRNA GT jab)

Big Pharma Profits over commonsense, actual science and safety.

The mRNA jab can only suppresses symptoms and may actually cause additional variants of covid 19 and was Corruptly, by deceit placed under a "vaccine category" for NO manufacturer liability (manufactures of the fake jab protected from all or any lawsuits). And later ironically, the complete definition of a vaccine was changed.

Those mRNA gene therapy jab manufactures only received an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) if no other treatments existed. Now you know why they attacked HCQ, Ivermectin, etc. so hard. $$$$$.

"Are we to believe these 270 people and their opinions over the single most knowledgeable DOCTOR of the mRNA vaccine who just also happens to be the guy who invented it, Virologist Dr. Robert Malone? Who also stated that the mRNA jab doesn't immunize anyone, it's dangerous, and it shouldn't be mandated"

And speaking of the FDA, the only thing that they have done ethically was to list the 22 side effects of the mRNA GT jabs back in 2020.

Of course these 270 liberal censorship demanders, not actual doctors never stated…

That Pfizer spent $25.9 million lobbying in 2020 and lobbying the CDC and the FDA (the left and right arm of big pharma) while the two departments weighed recommending and authorizing its vaccine for emergency use.

AND NOTE*** none of those 270 liberal for censorship stated that the mRNA GT jab manufacturers, pay 75% of the FDA's drug review process budget.

So in other words yes, the FDA repays the mRNA gene therapy jab manufactures by rushing their never tried on humans before jabs, to market with full approval.

Jab Manufactures profits before safety!

But that's not all…everything covid receives very profitable incentives.

Have any of these liberal 270 signers benefited financially?

Hospitals receive a bonus payment of $17,000 from the federal government for every patient confirmed to have COVID-19, In addition to a bonus payment of $37,000 is paid for any patient going on a ventilator. it has been calculated that hospitals receive a bonus of $100,000 minimum for every COVID patient who has the elements of COVID diagnosis with remdesivir and ventilator treatment before a COVID cause of death."

No wonder, Attorneys around the country report an alarming uptick in calls for help from families of patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

No wonder 270 liberals demand censorship… profits before safety!

>>15542282

The Sauce…

https://today.uconn.edu/2021/05/why-is-the-fda-funded-in-part-by-the-companies-it-regulates-2/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=7cf5a36949ec

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/08/pfizer-full-fda-approval-greater-profits/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorneys-report-spike-in-calls-from-families-of-patients-hospitalized-with-covid-19_4250727.html?utm_source=ref_share&utm_campaign=mb-

http://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

https://thehighwire.com/videos/a-coming-covid-catastrophe/

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/amazon-fulfillment-center-near-toronto-ordered-closed-over-covid-19-outbreak

Why has the CDC changed the definition of a vaccine? - Verificat

Sep 29, 2021 — "After covid-19 vaccines were introduced, and it was discovered that they do not necessarily "prevent disease" or "provide immunity", the CDC …https://www.verificat.cat/vaccines/entry/why-has-the-cdc-changed-the-definition-of-a-vaccine

Several questions have been raised over the years about CDC taking money from pharma/vaccine manufacturers…

https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/pharma/can-cdc-in-the-us-takings-millions-from-pharma-industry-be-unbiased/47357501

‘A Menace to Public Health’: Doctors Demand Spotify Puts an End to Covid Lies on ‘Joe Rogan Experience’

Unlike many platforms, Spotify doesn’t have a clear policy prohibiting misinformation. 270 physicians and scientists are hoping to change that

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/covid-misinformation-joe-rogan-spotify-petition-1282240/

An Open Letter to Spotify: A call from the global scientific and medical communities to implement a misinformation policy

https://spotifyopenletter.wordpress.com/2022/01/10/an-open-letter-to-spotify/

Majority of ‘270 doctors’ who signed letter demanding Spotify take action against Joe Rogan are not medical doctors

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10418589/Most-270-signed-anti-Joe-Rogan-letter-demanding-Spotify-action-not-actually-doctors.html

Minnesota doctors join campaign to censor Joe Rogan

https://alphanews.org/minnesota-doctors-join-campaign-to-censor-joe-rogan/

>>15542282

>>15542284

The FDA accepts legal aid from Pfizer and delays releasing licensure pages till May

As the Lynnwood Times reported previously, Federal Judge Mark T. Pittman of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to accelerate the release of an estimated 451,000 pages of material related to the licensing of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine on January 6, 2022.

The FDA must produce “more than 12,000 pages” on or before January 31, 2022. From there, the administration is required to produce “the remaining documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every 30 days, with the first production being due on or before March 1, 2022, until production is complete,” according to the court order.

FDA’s push back due to staffing issues

Pushback from the FDA has primarily focused on staffing issues. As Reuters reported on January 7, “The FDA didn’t dispute it had an obligation to make the information public but argued that its short-staffed FOIA office only had the bandwidth to review and release 500 pages a month.”

According to court documents, the FDA originally only “allocated the equivalent of nearly 11 full-time staff to this project.”

Then, to meet the demand of reviewing so many papers, “The FDA […] plans to hire 15 contractors, ‘detail’ 8 agency employees, and assign 5.5 of its normal review staff to the project, for a total of 28.5 reviewers.” It seems a daunting task, then, to have less than 30 workers review 55,000 pages in one month.

As a result, the FDA “insists it must delay its first 55,000-page production until May 1, 2022 – four months after the Court entered its order.”

However, the FDA received Pfizer’s Biologics License Application (BLA) in May of 2021, which, again, included more than 450,000 pages, and was able to review and approve the application by August that same year according to the administration’s approval letter. To accomplish this task, the FDA would have had to examine roughly 112,500 pages a month.

FDA accepts legal aid from Pfizer

On January 21, the FDA accepted Pfizer’s legal aid. The pharmaceutical company persisted its involvement would be necessary to prevent exposing trade secrets and confidential commercial information to the public.

As the court document states, “due to the unprecedented speed with which the Court has ordered FDA to process the records at issue, FDA anticipates that coordination with Pfizer to obtain the company’s views as to which portions of the records are subject to Exemption 4, the Trade Secrets Act (“TSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1905, or other statutory protections will be a necessary component of the agency’s endeavors to meet the extraordinary exigencies of this case.”

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/81685/the-fda-acc