The Truckers, GoFundMe, and the CIA; connecting dots

by Jon Rappoport

February 7, 2022

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/02/07/the-truckers-gofundme-and-the-cia-connecting-dots/

As of this writing, GoFundMe has cut off (stolen) $9 million from the Canadian Trucker Convoy.

The money was donated by thousands of individuals to support the truckers, who are demanding the Canadian government cancel vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, and brutal COVID restrictions.

After a major backlash from the enraged public, GoFundMe has stated it will automatically refund all $9 million to the individual donors.

Regardless, GoFundMe will not forward the money to the group it was intended for: the truckers.

All right: here come the dots—

A venture capital firm, Accel, and Technology Crossover Ventures, own the majority stake in GoFundMe.

The big infusion of cash that sent Mark Zuckerberg and his fledgling college enterprise on their way came from Accel, in 2004.

Jim Breyer, head of Accel, attached a $13 million rocket to Facebook, and nothing has ever been the same. (Breyer—billionaire, CFR, World Economic Forum, major fund investor in China.)

Earlier in 2004, a man named Gilman Louie joined the board of the National Venture Capital Association of America (NVCA). The chairman of NVCA? Jim Breyer. Gilman Louie happened to be the first CEO of the important CIA start-up, In-Q-Tel.

In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999, with the express purpose of funding companies that could develop technology the CIA would use to “gather data.”

That’s not the only connection between Facebook funder and Accel’s Jim Breyer and the CIA’s man, Gilman Louie. In 2004, Louie went to work for BBN Technologies, headed up by Breyer. Dr. Anita Jones also joined BBN at that time. Jones had worked for the CIA’s In-Q-Tel and was an adviser to DARPA, the Pentagon’s technology department that helped develop the Internet.

With these CIA/DARPA connections, it’s no surprise that Jim Breyer’s jackpot investment in Facebook is not part of the popular mythology of Mark Zuckerberg. Better to omit it. Who can fail to realize that Facebook, with its endless stream of personal data, and its tracking capability, is an ideal CIA asset?

Accel co-owns the majority stake in GoFundMe. Accel has a history of rubbing shoulders with the CIA. Accel helped launch Facebook, the largest profiling and data-mining company in the world.

Given all this, it might be more surprising if GoFundMe DIDN’T cut off the Canadian truckers’ $9 million.

It’s also worth mentioning that Accel has invested in Spotify, the platform whose number-one star is Joe Rogan. Spotify is now under pressure to cancel Rogan, because his views and guests don’t align 100% with the official COVID narrative. In step one of a new censorship program, Spotify has stated it will post warning messages on all content that veers from official COVID positions and offer links to approved government and public health sources (for outrageous lies).

GoFundMe, Accel, Facebook, CIA, In-Q-Tel, Jim Breyer, CFR, World Economic Forum, major investments in China.

Basically, The Club.

The member’s statement of belief: “More money for me, less freedom for the peons, global control.”

>>15574962

In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999, with the express purpose of funding companies that could develop technology the CIA would use to “gather data.”

Omicron is Not Normal

Everything suggests this variant was leaked from a laboratory engaged in gain-of-function research.

eugyppius

Dec 20, 2021

Omicron is not normal. No immediate progenitors are known; its closest relatives are viruses last seen in early- to mid-2020. The orthodox explanation for this awkward fact, is that it has spent the last 18 months lurking “in a geography with poor genomic surveillance … or … in a chronically infected individual.” The simpler explanation is that it leaked from a laboratory.

As el gato malo and others have indicated, evidence is strong that Omicron circulates preferentially in the vaccinated. In all likelihood, it is the result of gain-of-function research, in which SARS-2 was passaged repeatedly through convalescent or vaccinated plasma, in the hopes of helping the virus evade acquired immunity. The purpose of this research would be to anticipate future immune-escape variants that vaccines might target.

Omicron carries a series of highly unlikely and suspicious mutations in its spike protein. It is hard to imagine that these mutations can have arisen via natural processes, because all but one of them are nonsynonymous – that is, they code for different amino acid sequences. Starkly mutated variants favoured by natural selection should have a great many meaningless synonymous mutations as well.

Omicron’s ancestors may have spent a significant amount of time adapting to mouse cells, before re-entering human hosts. Omicron appears selected to replicate primarily in the bronchial tract. Deeper in the human lung, it functions far less efficiently than Delta or the first strains from Wuhan. This is probably why it causes mostly mild illness, and it is reminiscent of techniques used to make live attenuated influenza vaccines safer for use in humans. Such vaccines are cold-adapted, that is, selected to circulate primarily in the cooler upper respiratory tract rather than in the warmer, more vulnerable lungs.

The balance of the evidence is that Omicron leaked from a lab engaged in SARS-2 vaccine research. There are many possibilities: It might represent a live, attenuated virus vaccine used informally among researchers, that mutated back to virulence and escaped; it might have been released accidentally; it could even be an attempt to develop a self-spreading vaccine to immunise animals or third world populations.

UPDATE: Igor Chudov points to his own similar analysis from 2 December.

SAUCES

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigenic-in-denmark

https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1466919567565934596?s=20

https://twitter.com/P_J_Buckhaults/status/1465739216374038530?s=20

https://researchnews.cc/news/10606/HKUMed-finds-Omicron-SARS-CoV-2-can-infect-faster-and-better-than-Delta-in-human-bronchus#.Yb-JuYHGK-q

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10578119/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-1254-y

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/omicron-is-not-normal/comment/4090707

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/urgent-omicron-variant-likely-to

>>15577776

>https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-mark-carney-end-freedom-convoy-ottawa-state-of-emergency/

What a crock.

The rule of law means any policy of government must be in accord with the highest law of the land, the CONSTITUTION. And, it may surpirse the author of that opinion piece, but 'mandates' are not supreme over our rights and freedoms. Not by a long shot.

As for sedition, the dolt has no clue what he is talking about. Any government is subject to votes of no confidence and can be replaced through the Parliamentary process. Any leader of a political party can be voted out of that leadership role by the party caucus - none of that has ever been sedition. Indeed, a sitting PM can be voted out as the leader of his party and thus out of the PM OFFICE by his own caucus. Simple straight forward parliamentary democracy.

As for the recent election of a MINIORITY government, well, it is also subject to no-confidence votes and can be toppled at anytime the majority in the House of Commons votes for that change.

None of that is sedition.

However, trampling the Constitution is a hell of a lot closer to treason than anything the protestors have done.

Theft of funds that do NOT belong to the Government is a very grave crime against the free people of the country. However, it seems to be applauded by the most corrupt people in Ottawa.

Likewise the attempt to penalize lawful truckers whose protest has galvanized more than half of the country's population. Soon the dopes who talk of sedition and who hang that accusation on the fact of a MINORITY government elected by a minority of voters will have to learn to live as the marginalized fringe that they have always really been.

Too bad so sad. Whah, whah, whah.

>>15577874

Blatant. Most of his advisors within the PM office are tied to the CCP either through lobbying in favor of CHINA policies or through financial conflicts of interest with state-owned or state-controlled Chinese corporations.

The whole batch of LIB hotshots are beholden to a foreign power that has ill intent toward the Canadian people.

What possibly could go wrong with that?

REQUEST TO CANADA ANNONS.

Where is the Ontario Superior Court's injunction. Asking for purpose of examining the wording. Suspecting that the demonstrators could open a lane in each direction to satisfy the basis for the injuction.

Also, looking for the written state of emergency that the Premier of Ontario claimed he had issued. Purpose is to examine it and compare with the appropriate legislation and precedents. Suspect the declared emergency does not meet the legislative criteria.

Thanks Anons.

Thanks Baker.

>>15543965

>>15607652

The demonstrators prolly have considerable tactical advantage. For example, for those truckers who wish to leave the situation, an open lane would be needed anyway. Plus there are trucks on the bridges or backed up on the highway, for example, that are not part of the demonstration and would be happy to be on their way.

As the leavers depart, the holdfasts or replacements might maneuver between the two lanes. Even if the route was reduced to fifty percent capacity, that is a win for the truckers and a loss for the political authorities. The general idea has surely occured to the police as well as the demonstrators who earlier today did negotiate some sort of an arrangement.

This is not over until it is over. And even if the truckers complied 100 percent, it would take a long time because of the logistics of moving so many trucks that have stood still.

>>15607675

One more thought on the situation at Windsor and the AMBASSADOR BRIDGE. The actionable item is the court injunction in the Ontario jurisdiction or side of the route. It does not extend to the jurisdiction on the other side.

But where it does apply, it is a form of court order and those who do not comply with it may be held in contempt of court - civilly or criminally. If those who chose to be arrested on contempt charges, and who do so peacefully and without rancour, they would prolly be found guilty – but that would require a proper hearing before a judge so that takes time and resources on the part of the authorities. However, the price paid would be a fine, most likely, and being pulled out of the demonstration. Limitations might be placed on how close the individual could come to the demonstration during the life of the injuction. Most likely, such an individual would not repeat offend. On the other hand, this could provide tremendous appeal symbolically. Could lead to hunger strikes or somesuch. Lots of options. But I think generally such an individual held in contempt would be careful not to lose his rig. Selectively, a driver who has little to lose might or who would be ready to go that far, might do things to his rig that makes it next to impossible to relocate. All it would take is one or two such individuals.

>>15607711

Thank very much, friend.

Now that is a start.

>>15607711

https://www.citywindsor.ca/Newsroom/Documents/ISSUED%20Order%20Morawetz%20FEB%2011%202022%20CV-22-30791.pdf

Court issued injujction.

11 FEB 2022

WINDSOR

see PDF

>>15607744

Thanks friend. That gives something to dig deeper.

The rhetoric used by the Premier might undermine his legal position. To say that the protest has transformed from a protest to a seige and that THIS justifies the declaration is a remarkable leap. The rhetoric is prolly theatrical and not really part of the declaration.

The 42 hour interval is a bit odd. Not a round number like 24 or 48 hours. But it is referred to as the initial declaration as if there are stages or that this one would be revoked upon the declaration of the next. Each must be justified on its own two feet. So it is not gonna fly that the first is 'extended' through a second declaration. There is either an emergency or there is not.

The additoinal authority, as it is referred to in the article, to revoke the personal and commercial licences of anyone who does not comply with new orders will have to stand the test of justification and the rule of proportionality. THIS LOOKS a lot like the sort of fines for masking and such that loom over people but are eventually dropped and not taken to court to be contested. So, my impression is this is a scare tactic for the most part.

And those types of threats amount to harrassment rather than lawful action. Politically, looks weaker than the huff-puffing.

The real impact would be in potential contempt of court charges, however, it appears there too a lot of discretion comes into play, according to the wording of the injuction.

An individual could be detained and released without charges, for instance, at the discretion of the law enforcement officers on the scene. This may lead to selective catch and release where the detained individual promises to not return to the protest. That would not prevent such an individual from helping the demonstration through other means.

But the selective pursuit of the leaders might be a tactic that the demonstrators would need to guard against by protecting those individuals from being caught up in a police action. Very move-countermove stuff.

>>15607856

There is lots of room for the protestors to have taken certain actions BEFORE receiving notice of the injunction. That cannot be held against them. But acting after notice would be considered subject to violation of the injuction's terms, I think.

The truckers did not, as a group, show up as defendants. That is interesting. It expedited the court process but it also may have laid a trap for the movers of the motion - the parties that sought the court's intervention. If they have not been fulsome in their disclosures, they could face significant costs should they lose the case on the merits later.

However, since the defendants did not contest the injuction in court, they can't go back to revisit the shaping of the injuction's provisions as a way of contesting this or that individual's breaching of the provisions. The injunction says the order can be implemented by law enforcement on a timing of its choosing, so that pretty much leaves a lot of room for extended maneuvering – which is reasonable given the size of the task of removing vehicles.

I think each trucker will have to formally be given notice to comply and that each can extensively seek clarifications on the provisions. Hence the wide discretion given to law enforcement. This may be used to 'disguise' political directions given from outside of the police forces deployed.

This is speculation on my part, but it does look like the court has returned the ball to the court of public opinion and political theatre. Very few details in the injunction on how to proceed or endpoints. Kind of made to bring things back and forth to the court, maybe.

>>15607741

From the injunction.

THIS COURT ORDERS that the Defendants and any persons having notice of this Order are hereby restrained and enjoined from impeding or blocking access to the Ambassador Bridge and indirect or direct approaching roadways and access points for ten (10) days from the date of this Order.

The key phrase is: impeding or blocking access.

Impede = hinder, delay, prevent, obstruct.

Block = obstruct normal functioning, make flow or movement difficult or impossible, prevent or restrict or hinder use.

Strictly speaking, doesn't appear that demonstrating in one lane while other lane or lanes are openned would mean impeding or blocking access.

Access is not the same as flow. Acces means entrance and egress, I think.

So already the demonstrators may have accomodated the injuction without there being a clear case of their having to abandon their protest. Looks like they could even slow roll the open lane from time to time, within limits, if they needed to dial up and dial down the pressure on their opponents while being considerate of the general demand for easing access.

>>15607974

Yes, all that you said is right on target for the enforcement and for the politicians.

However, injunctions and the prospect of contempt of court is a courtcentric provision that is not about contest of wills and such. The court will treat contempt very seriously because the notion is that the court sees itself as representing the rule of law itself. Different kettle of fish.

So in addition to avoiding other infractions like resisting the police or somesuch, the protestors now have to be pretty sharp on the provisions of the injunction. They can test those provisions, as per previous comment about the use of discretion that has been given to enforcement officers.

Lots of political poker playing but boy both Ford and Trudeau have weak hands and their bluster are very telling.

>>15608035

Gonna add that if they effect the flow of traffic roughly to the extent of that would have occured anyway with a significant portion of trucks not being on the road due to the vax mandate, then, they'd have a good counter balance to the whole shebang. If they played this well, and used the court submissions of the movers as yard sticks, they might win on the merits later. Could illustrate the point in the court of public opinion and drive home the symbolism of the mandates rather than the imagined, as opposed to actual, cost that the FEDS and PROV Govts are talking about.

SYMBOLISM is not a very strong justification for dragging people out of demonstrations or dragging them into paddy wagons or dragging them into court. Can backfire.

From the injunction, the potential for catch and release.

1. THIS COURT ORDERS that the Police shall retain discretion:

a. as to the timing and manner of enforcement of this Order, and specifically retained discretion as to the timing and manner of arrest and removal of any person pursuant to this Order;

b. to detain and release any person without arrest who the Police have reasonable and probable grounds to believe is contravening, or has contravened, any provision of this Order, upon that person agreeing to abide by this Order; and

c. and to lay any charges or take any other lawful action.

>>15608078

From the injunction, prohibitions are balanced with the recognition that the demonstrators can continue remain at liberty to peaceful, lawful and safe protest.

1. THIS COURT ORDERS that the Defendants and other persons remain at liberty to engage in a peaceful, lawful and safe protest, that does not impede or block access to the Ambassador Bridge and approaching roadways. For greater certainty, the terms of this Order and any applicable law must be complied with.

—-

Also from the injunction, possible room for demonstrators to engage in conduct that the order would otherwise prohibit, provided that the individual/s act in the course of a duty such as safely directing the moving of vehicles or somesuch.

1. THIS COURT ORDERS that this Order shall not apply to persons acting in the course of or in the exercise of a statutory duty, power or authority.

For example, suppose there is room for some jockeying across closed and open lanes or moving rigs into and out spaces vacated by a departing trucker. Then there is some room in which to play, possibly, provided that it remains peaceful and so forth.

This brings to mind how the CONVOY in Ottawa recently re-arrange trucks in the available space – space that so far was conceded to the demonstration; the police did not interfere.

There is a good deal of reasonableness in the wording here. Discretion is the big factor. So is communications between demonstrators and enforcement officers.

If the police attempt to do a wholesale detain and fine move on a portion of the demonstration in Windsor, that would really tax their resources heavily. Meanwhile, Biden might cave after giving Trudeau a chance to play tough on the Ontario side of the border; on the Michigan side this court injuction has no direct impact. The congestion right now is a mix of Canadian and American truckers on both sides of the border.

>>15608100

Yes, on the ground tactics vs logistics. The remote fights in courtrooms tend to run out the clock.

Of course, it has gone unmentioned in recent posts, but the Ambassador Bridge is privately owned. Perhaps, if this was not all political theatre, then, why not tresspass the individuals on the bridge?

Unless the truckers move themselves, they won't be moved.

>>15607856

>>15607744

Declaration of Emergency

https://files.ontario.ca/solgen-69-22-emergency-declaration.pdf

>>15609611

Text from declaration.

ONTARIO REGULATION made under the

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND CIVIL PROTECTION ACT DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY

WHEREAS the interference with transportation infrastmcture, including essential trade

corridors, and other critical infrastmcture that is currently occurring in locations throughout the

Province prevents the movement of people and the delivery of essential goods and services and constitutes a danger of major proportions that could result in serious haim to persons and

substantial damage to property;

AND WHEREAS the criteria set out in subsection 7.0.1 (3) of the Act have been satisfied;

NOW THEREFORE, an emergency is hereby declared pursuant to section 7.0.1 of the Act in the whole of the Province of Ontario.

>>15609647

https://standupcanada.solutions/declarations-of-emergency

Criteria for declaration

(3) An order declaring that an emergency exists throughout Ontario or any part of it may be made under this section if, in the opinion of the Lieutenant Governor in Council or the Premier, as the case may be, the following criteria are satisfied:

1. There is an emergency that requires immediate action to prevent, reduce or mitigate a danger of major proportions that could result in serious harm to persons or substantial damage to property.

1. One of the following circumstances exists:

i. The resources normally available to a ministry of the Government of Ontario or an agency, board or commission or other branch of the government, including existing legislation, cannot be relied upon without the risk of serious delay.

ii. The resources referred to in subparagraph i may be insufficiently effective to address the emergency.

iii. It is not possible, without the risk of serious delay, to ascertain whether the resources referred to in subparagraph i can be relied upon. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

FOR EMPHASIS - "immediate action to prevent, reduce or mitigate a danger of major proportions".

1. What immediate action?

2. What danger of major proportions?

FOR EMPHASIS: "Resources normally available … including existing legislation"

1. Highway laws exist and have been available for immediate use.

2. Tresspass laws exist likewise.

3. Mischief and other laws likewise.

The question then arises, what does the declaration add to the ability of the government's law enforcement services that was not already available?

>>15609750

The Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act.

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90e09/v2#BK13

>>15609774

From the ACT:

Purpose

7.0.2 (1) The purpose of making orders under this section is to promote the public good by protecting the health, safety and welfare of the people of Ontario in times of declared emergencies in a manner that is subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

FOR EMPHASIS: "Purpose … promote the public good" … "in a manner that is subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms".

The promotion of the public good is not the same as the statist notion of prioritizing the [greater good] over freedom and to quash a minority.

Such promotion or actions are subordinate to the CHARTER.

>>15609750

>The question then arises, what does the declaration add to the ability of the government's law enforcement services that was not already available?

One addition is that the Premier, or his office and his delegates, can directly control what otherwise would be the functions of municipal or local/regional emergency planning authorities. DIRECT POLITICAL CONTROL from TORONTO.

There may be other things such as pulling in police services from other cities that are at some distance from the location of the supposed emergency, if the emergency is aimed at that location.

In this instance, it appears that the declaration may be provincewide and not limited to the bridge at the border in Windsor nor the bounds of downtown Ottawa. The rhetoric would leave a different impression, but this seems like martial law across the province.

>>15609814

From the ACT:

Criteria for emergency orders

(2) During a declared emergency, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make orders that the Lieutenant Governor in Council believes are necessary and essential in the circumstances to prevent, reduce or mitigate serious harm to persons or substantial damage to property, if in the opinion of the Lieutenant Governor in Council it is reasonable to believe that,

(a) the harm or damage will be alleviated by an order; and

(b) making an order is a reasonable alternative to other measures that might be taken to address the emergency. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

Limitations on emergency order

(3) Orders made under this section are subject to the following limitations:

1. The actions authorized by an order shall be exercised in a manner which, consistent with the objectives of the order, limits their intrusiveness.

1. An order shall only apply to the areas of the Province where it is necessary.

1. Subject to section 7.0.8, an order shall be effective only for as long as is necessary. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

FOR EMPHASIS: "limits their intrusiveness" … "effective only for as long as is necessary".

Think of the three covid-related emergency declarations and orders that went on, in aggregate, for about 1 and a half years and yet the fruits of those orders - various restrictions - still continue after the revocation of emergency. AND THAT IS WHY THE DEMONSTRATORS are protesting.

To counteract the protest against restrictions that flowed from a revoked emergency, the Premier has just declared another emergency and will issue orders once again. The public should be on guard against restrictions that will be legislated to live on long after the expiration of the orders and long after the revocation of emergency.

The pattern portends perpetual police state.

>>15609847

See emergency orders and types of orders. Here are a few choice examples.

1. Regulating or prohibiting travel or movement to, from or within any specified area.

1. Using any necessary goods, services and resources within any part of Ontario, distributing, and making available necessary goods, services and resources and establishing centres for their distribution.

1. Authorizing, but not requiring, any person, or any person of a class of persons, to render services of a type that that person, or a person of that class, is reasonably qualified to provide.

1. Subject to subsection (7), requiring that any person collect, use or disclose information that in the opinion of the Lieutenant Governor in Council may be necessary in order to prevent, respond to or alleviate the effects of the emergency.

FOR EMPHASIS: "prohibiting travel or movement" – this is still subject to mobility rights in the constitution.

FOR EMPHASIS: "any person of a class of persons, to render services" – Think tow truck drivers, think drivers, and consider the prospect of pressurizing tow truck companies as well as fellow truckers.

FOR EMPHASIS: "use or disclose information that … may be necessary in order to … alleviate the effects of the emergency."

Think banking information and restrictions on access to accounts.

>>15609611

The declaration, I think, is mostly for political showmanship, however, the tone and the tenor appears to promote statism such that pressure can be brought to bear on private actors to act against the demnstrators – unlawfully.

That is part of the pattern of covidmania.

Also, much of this is bluster and ineffective under law, however, that does not mean that it has no effect in prompting unlawful behavior. Also note that the Bridge is privately owned and might be vulnerable to pressure on the owners.

The political danger, for the demonstrators, is that all this bluster will create a mob mentality against them. Still, it must be said, that statists do like to smother or drown their victims in legalisms and complexities that cover-up lack of lawfulness.

THAT IS the point of the protest also. That the mandates are not lawful but have been imposed by law enforcement and even backed by the courts due to defference to the political hacks.

In terms of potential political counter actions to the declaration, there is provision for the legislature of the province to over-ride the Premier. The likelihood of this, and its plausibility, depends on the mood of the electorate and its infuence on the individual members of the provincial legislature.

Anons can reckon that one way or the other.

From the ACT:

Disallowance of emergency by Assembly

7.0.9 (1) Despite section 7.0.7, the Assembly may by resolution disallow the declaration of emergency under section 7.0.1 or the extension of an emergency. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

Same

(2) If the Assembly passes a resolution disallowing the declaration of emergency or the extension of one, any order made under subsection 7.0.2 (4) is revoked as of the day the resolution passes. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

FOR EMPHASIS: "the Assembly may by resolution disallow the declaration of emergency".

The Premier will plow ahead, as he did with the 3 covid declarations of emergency, assuming his own supreme authority and that of his CABINET via the inner circle. FORD has colluded with the TRUDEAU inner circle before and is continuing that pattern here.

>>15610047

re >>15608357

Where is post >>15608357

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15608238.html#15608357

>>15608356

>>15608358

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15608238.html#15608356

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15608238.html#15608358

>>15610426

She will not survive the political fallout of her acting against the evidence that the people who got the C19 shot can get and spread C19.

Infectiousness is not reduced by the shot.

Meanwhile, the spread is not lethal to the vast majority of peoplle - including the elderly - but Henry could do better by promoting early outpatient treatment for all.

That does reduce spread and does reduce hospitalization and does reduce deaths by 80 percent amongst the most vulnerable.

>>15610561

The democratic rights of Canadians have been trampled. Scientism is at the root of covidmania and climate-mania too. The TRUDY government has bought all in for both manias. One has fed the other.

>>15610598

>https://www.rebelnews.com/trailer_operation_bearhug

Notable.

>>15611316

Notable as summation of rapid growth of movement.

Mischief in Canadian criminal law

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-430.html

(6) No person commits mischief within the meaning of this section by reason only that

(a) he stops work as a result of the failure of his employer and himself to agree on any matter relating to his employment;

(b) he stops work as a result of the failure of his employer and a bargaining agent acting on his behalf to agree on any matter relating to his employment; or

(c) he stops work as a result of his taking part in a combination of workmen or employees for their own reasonable protection as workmen or employees.

THIS is at the core of the peaceful demonstrations. Re-read (c).

Now, compare with the theft of jerry cans and fuel. Interfering with the property of someone is mischief and so the police in Ottawa stand accused by the official words of the police in Windsor.

Picture = 1000 words.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy1STaRssMM

Very laid-back. Prelude. Calm before the storm.

>>15609774

>https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90e09/v2#BK13

Majority vote in ONTARIO LEGISLATURE could end declared emergency and with it all orders.

Disallowance of emergency by Assembly

7.0.9 (1) Despite section 7.0.7, the Assembly may by resolution disallow the declaration of emergency under section 7.0.1 or the extension of an emergency. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

Same

(2) If the Assembly passes a resolution disallowing the declaration of emergency or the extension of one, any order made under subsection 7.0.2 (4) is revoked as of the day the resolution passes. 2006, c. 13, s. 1 (4).

FOR EMPHASIS

any order made under subsection 7.0.2 (4) is revoked as of the day the resolution passes.

>>15619685

And later that same day this happened.

Guess it was too boring standing around without anything to do really.

https://www.facebook.com/Canadaunblocked/videos/1086120505513392

>>15622355

The scene with the four armed officers, in what looked like battle gear, looked stagey. The image perhaps meant to invoke Oka or FLQ crisis images.

This looked like a psychological nudge. It may have been staged or it may have been fortuitous. But the images with the dog and the armed 'soldiers' are useful to the government.

REVIEW the for the screencaps and look for the 4 points; and then watch the video in which they tackled the harmless dude, Was he the 5th player in the cast - planted or not.

There is a meme war for public opinion. On one hand this sort of imagery might satisfy some nervous nellies; and on the other hand, think, PET's bleeding hearts remark back in 1972.

No doubt this imagery and that rhetoric will be harkened in the coming days. It was hinted at in the most recent PM press conference when a reporter asked about the FLQ crisis and PET's infuence on TRUDY.

>>15623068

Correction October 1970.

context

https://youtu.be/PHaoBD-eakk

retrospective view from 2011

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2153205799

full questioning and responses

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1241195075951

>>15623117

retrospective view was from September 2001

>>15622534

Noice map.

Biden can't close his southern border and may not keep open his northern border.

>>15623068

Mass Email,

13 FEB 2022

Keean Bexte

Editor-in-Chief

TheCounterSignal.com

Trudeau may invoke the War Measures Act as early as tomorrow.

Technically, it is now called the Emergencies Act, but let's call it like it is.

The act would allow Trudeau to go to war with unarmed, civilian protesters in Ottawa and across the country.

This is a shocking escalation. The last time this was used, a politician had been kidnapped and killed.

Using it on peaceful demonstrators who have not lifted a finger against anyone is unheard of. This is on track to be Canada's Tiananmen Square.

The Act gives the government unchecked and nearly unlimited power to wield as Trudeau sees fit.

Trudeau convened a last-minute Sunday night cabinet meeting just moments ago. Tomorrow, The Counter Signal has confirmed that the Prime Minister is meeting with Premiers from across the country - a step that needs to be taken before the Act is invoked.

As a result, I am now sitting at the Calgary International Airport, waiting to catch a flight to Ottawa so that I can be on the ground if (and when) Trudeau suspends the rule of law in Canada.

This moment is too critical to trust the CBC to cover it. I will be publishing my work as widely as possible to do what I can to keep this government in check. Tomorrow, all hell could break loose.

P.P.S. If Trudeau declares war on peaceful protesters tomorrow, it proves what we have been worried about all along. Trudeau is truly a tyrant.

>>15623689

TRUDEAU is trying to get ahead of the vote on the CONSERVATIVE motion to end the mandates and to require the Feds Govt to prepare a plan to end all restrictions. Also, if he is seen to act alone, he will hope that his polling numbers will improve to save his hide at least for awhile.

When at war, typically, the government benefits from a general circling of the wagons, sorta speak. THAT may be misplaced in this circumstance because of the popularity of the peaceful protest.

>>15627218

Supposed opposition of provincial premiers aginst Federal emergencies act is based on perceived betrayl of a fed-prov deal that has gone on for two years. The premiers presumed their martial law gave them a fiefdom. Now it appears Trudeau is trying to bust the deal and declare himself boss of all provincial jurisdictions and over-ride the emergency declarations in each province. He would then commandeer the local police forces.

Speculation based on the differences in each province's emergencies acts and orders versus that of the federal emergency act and likely orders.

Independent political opposition will not be tolerated.

When the democracies of the world are navel-gaizing, they are not opposing the anti-democracies of the world which have an even freerer hand to act both within their own borders and in vassal states.

In human history, when nations are ruled by tyrants, wars are far more common. Wars between factions within such nations are far more common. There is no rule that is survives the fracturing and smothering of civilizations.

>>15625042

The denegration will continue.

New oaths will be taken.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-5.html#docCont

>>15628172

So help us God.