Anonymous ID: 00ec0e Feb. 4, 2022, 9:03 a.m. No.15544424   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15543964 pb

>

>>>15543949

>

>This Video Will Get Ron Watkins Elected to Congress.

>

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UwTtS6cRzc

not bad, it's like he tries to emulate the speeches Stephen Miller wrote for Trump, like the speech in the "video that got trump elected" or the inauguration speech โ€ฆ to secure the seat he needs endorsement from POTUS/Q+ โ€ฆ endorsement from Q matters less.

 

it should be a cakewalk to get the endorsement from Q+

Anonymous ID: 00ec0e Feb. 4, 2022, 9:10 a.m. No.15544482   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4512

>>15544376

>Has Posobiec, Rogan, Russell Brand, Flynn, Wood, MTG, Wendy Rodgers, Codemonkeyz, Martin Geddes or any other platformed, seemingly 'Q- affiliated' persona EVER posted Q posts, or links with a mention to see and think for yourself?

>

>No.

>

>They can't share the below. They won't. They don't.

>

>qmap.pub

>

>qanon.pub

>

>qanon.app

>

>There is only us. Those names are NOT sharing/amplifying Q.

Martin Geddes is a True Believer, I'd be surprised if he hadn't posted โ€ฆ Poso, Rogan, Russell Brand and Flynn don't believe in Q, Wood is a grifter or a madman, MTG and Wendy are tards โ€ฆ Codemonkey might sell Drops as NFTs

Anonymous ID: 00ec0e Feb. 4, 2022, 9:42 a.m. No.15544746   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4827 >>4878

>>15544660

>>>15544634 (You)

>

>Indeed. Martin Geddes, on his site under category/qanon, hasnot one link to Q posts. Thanks for confirming anon. Please correct if this is wrong.

>

>o7

well I guess it doesn't occur to Geddes as an IT pro that there are people so clueless that they cannot easily find all Q drops at aggregator sites

 

but for instance this essay by Geddes quotes extensively from the drops

 

Why #QAnon is the biggest story in the history of journalism

 

https://conservativechoicecampaign.com/why-qanon-is-the-biggest-story-in-the-history-of-journalism/

 

Geddes' writings look to me very orthodox Q believer stuff

Anonymous ID: 00ec0e Feb. 4, 2022, 10:01 a.m. No.15544897   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4935

>>15544827

>Believers can kick rocks. Knowers know.

 

knowing includes belief by definition

 

classic definition of knowing

 

Justified true belief is a definition of knowledge that gained approval during the Enlightenment, "justified" standing in contrast to "revealed".

The concept of justified true belief states that in order to know that a given proposition is true, one must not only believe the relevant true proposition, but also have justification for doing so. In more formal terms, an agent S knows that a proposition P is true if and only if:

 

 

P is true

S believes that P is true, and

S is justified in believing that P is true

Anonymous ID: 00ec0e Feb. 4, 2022, 10:09 a.m. No.15544952   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4966 >>4981

>>15544837

truth to be told Q pulled his Assange White Hat, Snowden Black Hat scheme out of his ass, no reason to blindly believe.

 

>>15544868

>>>15544785

>

>All the books of Paul pre-date the Gospels. Paul never met Jesus before his death, and his tales are from his celestial visions. When Paul's books were written, Jesus hadn't become personified yet, as he was still a literary construct. The idea of "Jesus Christ" existed before the story of his deeds was created. Fabrication, fiction, and fable are the foundations of Christianity. That's why there are so many contradictions between the books and reality.

a mythicist position