Anonymous ID: 7bda6d May 27, 2018, 12:25 a.m. No.1554804   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4895 >>5020

>>1554780

They aren't seeing the big picture when it comes to Nasim. All she wanted to do was make funny videos on youtube. But they wouldn't let her. They pushed a beautiful young woman who was a leftist like them into finally breaking away from their mind control. She freed herself and took matters into her own hands. In many ways, she is a champion of free speech. She should be treated with more respect.

Anonymous ID: 7bda6d May 27, 2018, 12:28 a.m. No.1554823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4840

>>1554805

Exactly. We have "Muh Dick" guy who shows up all the time. The guy absolutely hates Prince Harry, yet nobody says anything. They all talk shit about Nasim though. Crazy double standards.

Anonymous ID: 7bda6d May 27, 2018, 12:36 a.m. No.1554876   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4884

Does anyone remember the Q post a couple of months ago that said, and I'm paraphrasing, "A traitor leaked that POTUS was not a criminal target in the Mueller investigation & it wasn't supposed to be revealed yet." ??? Just as the media began to ask questions and get a little suspicious, there was a FBI [raid] at the most convenient time possible that helped regain control of the narrative that POTUS was the target. Has it crossed anyone's mind that the reason [raid] was in brackets in that Q post was because it was fake? Wray & Mueller probably collaborated together on this. Which is why Q told us to read the New York Times article carefully. The article was something about Michael Cohen casually talking to his friend on the phone during the fire at Trump Tower. If Cohen's house or apartment was being [raided], then why was he just casually talking? This might be why Q told us to read that article carefully.