>>1555434

If you're trying to make a joke out of /qresearch/ I don't know much better way than to infiltrate the kitchen and post un-sauced nonsense as Notable ... ie:

>>1554681 There are no coincidences.

>>1554694 Pray.

>>1554699 Backwards

>>1554726 Why fear?

>>1554758 There. I am human.

>>1554767 Not Q

>>1554789 Keyword: free

>>1554820 WE_ARE_Q.png

>>1554825 (Not literally)

>>1554838 Sometimes you're trapped in someone else's game.

>>1554869 How close is the nearest star?

>>1554872 Who am I?

>>1554878 rt, >>1554773

>>1554931 Deal already made. Who is this letter really for?

>>1554945 Only way to escape their game is to make them play yours.

>>1554989 So Why the Drama?

>>1555004 Goodnight and God Bless

>>1555031 rt >>1555015 !!! Goodnight

>>1555792

BO

those notables remind me of an old saying

better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and prove it

It is far far better to have just a few or no notables from a bread than stuff like

>>1554681 There are no coincidences.

>>1554694 Pray.

>>1554699 Backwards

>>1554726 Why fear?

>>1554758 There. I am human.

>>1554767 Not Q

>>1554789 Keyword: free

>>1554820 WE_ARE_Q.png

>>1554825 (Not literally)

>>1554838 Sometimes you're trapped in someone else's game.

>>1554869 How close is the nearest star?

>>1554872 Who am I?

>>1554878 rt, >>1554773

>>1554931 Deal already made. Who is this letter really for?

>>1554945 Only way to escape their game is to make them play yours.

>>1554989 So Why the Drama?

>>1555004 Goodnight and God Bless

>>1555031 rt >>1555015 !!! Goodnight

I was under the impression we were to gather public sourced accurate information that was going to help inform the public once the MSM is shown for the lying propaganda machine they are.

>>1555859

BO, what if there were NO good notable posts from that bread?

Are you just going to leave that nonsense in the dough?

Just because some anons support something or find it helpful does not make it notable case in point our sphere fearing friends

And as far as I know I did not ask YOU to do anything.

My original comment

>>1555777

was a simple statement of fact.

I'll concernfag a bit more since you don't seem to get my drift.

One good way to discredit any group is to tie them to stupid stuff they say.

IF the baker includes silly things in dough and they are removed it is one thing, if they stay uncorrected it becomes a weapon for our enemies.

I thought you actually learned something when I turned you on to W. E. Deming

>>1555927

>just trying to piss off the least amount of people

I understand that BO, but I hope you realize that is not always an option.

I see we agree on the major points here, you can see how I archive at /comms/

Since the Knowledgeable Anon posts that it is not Q I think the statement

Be careful who you follow should apply.

btw.

consensus rule is just another way to say mob rule. The majority is NOT always correct and here, when we know a goodly percentage of the group is newbies & clowns just how reliable is a majority opinion from a particular bread?

Only the BO & BVs can truly tell one baker from another…

I continue to find that a bit dangerous, but I have not found a solution yet.

>>1556047

I feel the integrity & veracity of /qresearch/ to be a worthy cause.

Clowns subtly polluting the bread by leaving out solid notables and including specious ones is something I call out every time I see it.

I archive the notables at /comms/ so I see them all and review the great majority.

There are very clear differences between bakers and it shows in their "ability to discern"