I think we are living in a world where there are organizations practising a social 'wrap up smear'.

1. Create disinformation talking point that politically benefits own organization.

2. Send to partners in fake news media.

3. Fake news media repeats 'talking point' over and over.

4. Viewing public 'sees' disinformation and ingests it.

5. Subsidiary narrative added designed to make bad people feel bad for questioning or disagreeing with 'talking point'.

6. Trick population into 'ingesting' and repeating disinformation as 'fact'.

7. Original source of disinfo talking point and partners in fake news media then 'wrap up' the talking point by then 'referring' to the echoed narrative to 'justify' the 'legitimacy' of the original disinfo talking point as 'true'.

This method, if the people can be 'put to sleep' by the wrap up smear way, opens up NEW 'markets'…for the very worst kinds of people AND it incentivizes further such activity to expand the power of this 'meta-informational' market with 'physical' 'material' consisting of human beings.

(Space for rent)

Wrap up smear examples:

"How to benefit fetus traffickers and baby/child trafficking?"

1. Introduce politically self serving disinformation that 'abortion' is 'about women's health'.

2. Forward to partners in fake news (and 'celebrity' assets to echo).

3. Fake news repeats talking point over and over

4. Viewing public sees talking point repeated 'everywhere' and ingests it.

5. Add subsidiary narrative that if you question or disagree, then you're meant to feel bad: Sexist, bigot, hater, etc. (dialectic formation of controlled opposites).

6. Trick population to 'look the other way' and repeat talking point to each other, and with contradictory narratives intentionally created and pushed, the ingesting creates necessary inconsistency/conflict/bug in the code.

7. Those who traffic fetuses and babies and children, rely on 'abortion factories' to source their new 'market'.

Money sourced goes to political parties and politicians which wraps up the wrap up smear again and further 'reference' echoes are made to justify, laws created to prevent ending of source of the entire market.

Any anon can decode reality this way.

It's relatively easy because there are so many examples to choose from.

You just take all the narrative associated with the originators who 'need' symbolism.

"How to traffic slave women and children across borders?"

Introduce talking point that laws towards 'open borders' are 'compassionate' while laws towards defending borders is 'racist'.

Public ingests.

'I question this' <-'You're a racist' dialectic formation by repeat, not proof, takes up information bandwidth, conflict source 'seen' from within targets according to 'group', 'pro this vs. anti that', despite being sourced from external to those speaking conflicting narratives.

The people can by pattern recognition reveal on their own a 'dark' organization CREATING self-serving disinformation talking points so as to foment conflicts between people by 'group' vs. 'group'.

The whole fake narrative is collapsing.

>>15555055

ALL THEY CAN DO NOW IS CREATE DIALECTIC OPPOSITES

Repeating talking point "No no no WE (cabal RINOs) are Lincoln!"

"If you hear any of them question our narrative, we want you to think and feel that you're talking with someone who agrees with 'those' people from 80 years ago."

Dialectic solely designed to turn population against itself, to deflect away from Cheney making really bad decisions based on information anons and autists knew was false years ago.

Nope, sorry Rep Cheney, and all others who practise the dark arts of deliberate deception for profit and power, I think anons know the playbook.

Call anons names.

Smear anons as haters.

Many of us are jews but are afraid to speak publicly because of tyrants like you who want to divide me from some of our best friends, families, or colleagues, or neighbors, or truckers, or store owners, or people who help us put food on the table, or people who made the table, or the house we're living in, and everything incredible good people of ALL backgrounds are making.

This statement cannot be true:

"Anon is a 'white supremacist'."

Anon cannot be corrupted with narrative designed to divide, because anon consciousness is UNIFIED, and because the people are UNIFIED.

Anon is selfless, colorless, religionless, classless, sexless, political affiliiation-less, Anon is ultimately a hiveminded source of saved digital information collected since at least 2016.

Cheney and every other politician who 'attack' anon give themselves own nooses because they expose their own 'need' for dialectic symbolism.

Anon is bulletproof, corruptionless, no attacks against Anon will divide anyone because everyone and no-one is Anon.

God bless Jews, Christians, Muslims, God bless us all.

Anon is not the party of dialectic division.

Anon 'unifies' what was destroyed by RINOs and Democrats.

Hey NHL, that guy singing right now is so bad at lip synching his mouth is nowhere close to the music.

>>15554981

Introducing bad people on the red carpet early enough, which will succeed in teaching the public about 'a' name to link together the 'narrative' on covid.

Fauci proven originator of contradictions.