Anonymous ID: cc3af8 Feb. 5, 2022, 10:18 p.m. No.15558772   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8781

>>15558713

>you are fucking worthless

>otherwise

>you would arrest my abusers

Perhaps it is time for you to arrest your abusers.

They don't want you to know you have this power, so it may seem an incredible proposition.

Why not just try it?

"In Jesus name I command that my abusers be arrested."

See what happens.

Anonymous ID: cc3af8 Feb. 5, 2022, 10:35 p.m. No.15558827   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8877

[Re: Walmart] One example is this: there was a US (Midwestern, if I remember right) major manufacturer of lawn sprinklers. Walmart decided that the maker was charging too much, and the maker, depending on the massive percentage of their sales through Walmart, was forced to lower prices. Walmart says, "not good enough", and suggests the sprinkler business relocate to China. So the manufacturer streamlines operations, imposes across-the-board wage and salary caps, and becomes super efficient, able to drop prices again, to the point Walmart thought appropriate, while remaining in the US. Walmart isn't impressed at all, BECAUSE they didn't go to China.

 

A leaked Walmart internal memo revealed this actually was Walmart's intent, and not just with one lawn sprinkler manufacturer. It was their standard operating procedure, and there was a clear, if vile, reasoning behind this that was spelled out perfectly.

 

So, why would a mega-corporation, ostensibly swayed only by the bottom line of profit maximization, actually want jobs leaving their biggest market? Why the seeming absurdity of pushing outsourcing for the sake of outsourcing? Wouldn't Walmart WANT Americans to have money, if for no other reason than to shop at their stores?

 

What wasn't noted in the leak were two factors that were happening then, and likely had a complimentary effect: China's middle class and consumer market was rapidly growing, and the Chinese Communist government was buying more and more into Walmart ownership.

 

The main justification for Walmart's position, however, betrays a new and diametrically opposed way of regarding populations. Decades prior, Henry Ford revolutionized the relationship between companies, workers, and consumers, by paying autoworkers a substantial sum. This was actually more than the union wanted, and competitors and shareholders found the pay rates and profit-sharing perks so intolerable that Ford was sued for treating his employees too well! Ford's rationale, beyond mere altruism, was that paying Ford workers well benefitted him. Partly by having a loyal and motivated workforce, partly by forcing competitors and other businesses to compete by raising their own companies' wages, the end effect being that more Americans could afford one of his mass-produced cars. Americans needed more income to afford a car, and Henry Ford helped make that a reality. Win-win.

 

Realizing that corporate giants could influence the national economy, Walmart upended this model. From their point of view, if more Americans are poor, they'll have few options but to buy Walmart's cheap merchandise. This is what the memo showed: that Walmart wants neighborhoods, families, and the nation itself crushed with poverty until Walmart is the ONLY place many can afford to shop.

 

https://gab.com/JerrySears/posts/107742343318631520

Anonymous ID: cc3af8 Feb. 5, 2022, 10:51 p.m. No.15558895   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9135 >>9281 >>9368

This medical data from the US DoD DMED database is explosive. Mainstream media has been ordered to ignore it.

The DMED data exposed by attorney Tom Renz and Senator Johnson is a smoking gun. General Austin should order all military docs to speak the truth. But he isn't. Why not?

 

The letter

 

On February 1, 2022, US Senator Ron Johnson sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on February 1 highlighting the dramatic rise in adverse events reported in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) after the vaccines were rolled out to the military. If the vaccines are truly “safe and effective,” these increases are difficult to explain.

 

The original data

 

Here are the resources with the original data:

Johnson’s 3 page letter to DoD Secretary Lloyd Austin III

Renz Law home page (includes video interviews)

Renz Law page on the DMED data with graphs (summary of the data)

 

Download the spreadsheet with all the numbers (Excel spreadsheet). Note that the numbers in the purple coded rows are the “corrected” data which was issued after the “glitch” was noticed. Hospitalized means the patient was in the hospital. Ambulatory are the stats for outpatients. Also note that the percentage calculation is wrong: they should have subtracted 1 since a “2X increase” is the same as a “100% increase.”

 

Why the DMED data is so important

 

There are 14 reasons that the DMED data is very important.

 

The individual doctors themselves realize that the vaccines are causing the harm documented in the DMED database. According to an insider I spoke to, around 40% of military docs realize what is going on, but doctors in the military can’t speak out against the vaccine because they are ordered not to say anything. So all these doctors have to remain silent. The data in DMED is their voice.

 

The original DMED data appears to be very reliable. It is hard for anyone to make excuses for the increased rates in the DMED database quoted in this letter because the event types with increases are all confirmed in the VAERS database. Unlike VAERS, this database cannot be dismissed using hand-waving arguments. DMED is not a self-reported database where reporting rates are unknown. It is a fully reported database where all the reports are from healthcare providers. In short, if the vaccines are safe, the DMED data is hard to explain. For example, you can’t pin the rise in events in 2021 on COVID since total hospital event rates declined in 2020 (relative to 2019) in both the original and corrected results. Note: The DoD now claims the 2016-2020 data was wrong and issued corrected values (graph on the right):

 

These are absolute rate increases. In VAERS, we’ll often compare a baseline rate of an event in prior years with the current year to look for a signal. This is a “differential signal” so high values are possible. For example, the reported VAERS rate for pulmonary embolism is 3 per year. Say it goes to 300 per year, a 100X jump. But if the baseline rates of PE are 1000, then on an absolute basis, this is just a 0.3X increase. So large absolute number jumps are very significant. This is exactly what we have in the DMED database: very large absolute jumps.

 

The effect sizes are huge. For example, the rates of hypertension increased by 21X from average in 2021. Nervous system diseases increased by a factor of 10.

 

Nobody can explain it. If it wasn’t the vaccine causing these huge increases in adverse events, what was it?

 

The military is deleting cases to make the effect size smaller. Watch this video DR. MALONE STATES DOD IS DELETING DATA FROM IT'S DATABASE TO COVER UP DAMAGES DONE BY THE "VACCINES"

 

It’s a great “conversation starter” with your pro-vax friends, local lawmakers, local health authority, and favorite fact-checkers. You simply ask a simple question, “How do you explain these dramatic rate increases in 2021 vs. the 5 year average?” This works particularly well at City Council meetings, school board meetings, and with lawmakers.

 

Symptoms with increases match the VAERS data. It is tough to claim the elevation in event rates is due to something else because a) the range of elevated symptoms is so large and b) the symptoms in DMED that are elevated match the symptoms in VAERS that are elevated.

 

The DoD is in a panic about this leaking out. This data wasn’t ever supposed to leak out. The only reason it leaked out is due to the efforts of three whistleblowers inside the DoD. According to an insider I spoke to, the DoD has no idea how they are going to cover it up. The only thing they’ve done is claim the 2016-2020 data is underreported, but this doesn’t match reality as I explain below.

 

[Continued]

 

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/this-medical-data-from-the-us-dod

Anonymous ID: cc3af8 Feb. 5, 2022, 10:57 p.m. No.15558919   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9135 >>9281 >>9368

I was sent this data by 2 completely separate sources I trust. Apparently the side effects of this vaccine on our military is so catastrophic, that they shut the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) so no one else can see it. If this is wrong then I’m sure the government will have no problem showing us the data, right?

 

I think we just figured out why they’re really building a fortified wall around the White House…..

 

Hypertension – 2,181% increase

Diseases of the nervous system – 1,048% increase

Malignant neoplasms of esophagus – 894% increase

Multiple sclerosis – 680% increase

Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs – 624% increase

Guillain-Barre syndrome – 551% increase

Breast cancer – 487% increase

Demyelinating – 487% increase

Neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands – 474% increase

Female infertility – 472% increase

Pulmonary embolism – 468% increase

Migraines – 452% increase

Ovarian dysfunction – 437% increase

Testicular cancer – 369% increase

Tachycardia – 302% increase

 

This is across all services. They created and released this virus to take away our rights, but it’s the vaccine that’s the real bioweapon….and we are officially under attack by greedy corporations and communist China.

 

https://gab.com/AmericanAFMindy/posts/107737815748876022

Anonymous ID: cc3af8 Feb. 5, 2022, 11:32 p.m. No.15559008   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15558998

>because BO/BV cheat to make it so

Mutations to the incoming post queue?

Can you confirm at which layer of the software stack this is being done?

Is post queue mutation an official capability of BO/BV role in the software stack, or is a hack being used?