>>15558345 (PB)

>>15558383 (PB)

The reference to 60% (off) was badly chosen and was meant to refer to the 60% of the truth which Q mentions. It was meant as an overly vague question about what that means when Q also says "the truth won't be for everyone". As in, we don't really understand what that means. Anons might come to MORE than 60% but the rest of the world just won't be ready for that? Or even the 60% that mankind receives will make some people despondent and they'll need more support? We don't know. It was certainly no confirmation of a belief that Q was talking about something dark. As hard as this might be, the promise of God is that we will be victorious and achieve a beautiful brave new world.

I pray, Father God, that you would bless your children as we, by your Grace, become freed by ancient evil.

May God strengthen our faith in Him and may He guide us toward righteousness, forgiveness and love, filling us with joy as we witness the salvation of mankind after so many years that we have struggled in darkness.

Forgive us our trespasses, Father, and deliver us from evil. I pray, Father you would turn the mistakes which we repent for into victories in the fulfillment of your loving Plan.

Amen

>>15558732

• from