>>1554752 (prev bread)

The Art Of The Shill

<They never thought she would lose.

<In most realities she didn't.

<Thank God you get to witness this one.

Implies that there are more than one 'realities'.

Declares that in most 'realities' evil wins.

This is the hidden logical flaw. The 'slide'.

There is no way that this anon can 'know' that evil wins in most realities,

unless,

this anon has 'been there', (meaning that he's more than just human)bc(he can travel between 'realities')

or,

has somehow been 'notified' of this 'fact'. (he's a prophet of God)bc(he implies that he believes in God when he tells us to 'Thank God')

In either case, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs.

No such proofs were provided.

And,

Whether you or I believe in the existence of God is irrelevant to the logical inconsistency in the whole argument,

bc he has not provided any proof that he is more than just human or that he is a prophet.

Beware of false prophets applies here even if you don't believe in God.

>>1554752 (prev bread)

The Art Of The Shill - Take Two

<They never thought she would lose.

<In most realities she didn't.

<Thank God you get to witness this one.

From a theological perspective, this anon's argument fails even worse.

If there is a God, then that entity must, by definition, be infinite.

For if the entity is finite then there is 'something' that makes it finite, some form of limiting force.

furthermore, if this entity is infinite, then this entity must, by definition, not be lacking in any way.

That's what it means to be infinite. No bounds. No limits. All encompassing. All knowing.

Taken to the logical conclusion, there is no need for this entity gain knowledge or experience.

Also,

By it's very nature, this entity will always give, not take.

There's nothing to take because it already encompasses all.

Why would such a being create a myriad of worlds where evil wins?

>>1556855

>Why would such a being create a myriad of worlds where evil wins?

>>1556880

>God wanted some friends.

Wanting something means there is something lacking to begin with.

>>1556886

>because it is infinite

An adequate response to this requires a few short paragraphs.

Are you really interested?

>>1556933

>You smell,,,,shilly.

Would you have preferred that I just say 'this anon is full of shit'?

Would that have satisfied you?