>>1556197 (from 1955)

Was >>1556044 pulled?

>>1556271

What TYPE of images are we looking for?

>>1556339

Similar description posted in the bread the morning it came out. The misspelling indicates good friend without other definition or something like that.

>>1556337

Are the potential POTUS id numbers all numerals instead of a mix? That's usually a good clue.

>>1556347

Thanks anon. By linking it I actually found it. Snagged the images.

>>1556347

I see what you did there.

Dear anons. Head to #1746 and see

>>1556018

and forward as it fills the bread.

Lots of old breads popping up in the catalog right now. Might be more of the same.

Said bread "closer" has a fully numerical ID.

Might also mean a review of #1746 is in order.

>>1556559

Well you used some very interesting graphics to do so.

1746 has some interesting one-posts without responses.

Had a couple of good Q drops, too.

Gettin the stinkeye from being on the computer so much already today.

Must. Go. Be. Human.

Here's hoping it's possible to catch up in a couple of days.