>>1625271
They're psychopaths, psychopaths operate in highly predictable ways. They're only unpredictable to people who don't know how a psychopath thinks.
Immorality to them is not a 'shame'. They have no morality compass: there is no 'threshold' when something becomes immoral or unusual or embarassing.
Smarter psychopaths use other people's reactions to gauge when they're crossing a line and when to 'pull back' - I've had psychopaths go so far over the line and get fired because I purposefully give them no reaction.
For them, the paintings of the abuse aren't shameful, horrible images. They're just images that depict what they did. The only 'emotion' psychopaths show is arrogance - so to them, you're just dumb little sheep for not figuring out that the images are depictions of their very own abuses, like how some murderers love to display corpses rather than bury them in fear.
It's a bit like pokemon, but the cards they trade are of their prior experiences abusing people.
I bet you they've had that artwork up there for decades, if not centuries.
Ask yourself: who paints the pictures?
What do they use for reference material?
The evidence is in the artwork.