Subconscious suggestion is not about the explicit, but the implied. With no ground to stand on, you try to float, but that idea's just going to keep sinking deeper.
So don't play bullshit games. Even you know your sentence made absolutely no sense with it's weird wordplay. Do you honestly think you're the first hypnotist I've encountered who thinks their strange word choices aren't highly noticeable?
You didn't even reply to a specific quote.
Pro-LGBTQ groups try to get a study showing higher rates (90%+) of abuse in children of same sex 'couples' censored, despite no major flaws with the analysis found, because, err 'Neo-Nazis cited it' (because who cites your work determines it's accuracy, apparently):
https://retractionwatch.com/2017/08/25/publisher-flags-paper-sex-parenting-neo-nazi-group-cites/
Any relation to Q's remark about the left-wing's "no pedo bashing"?
Does one wonder if LGBTQ is just a front to make pedophilia more acceptable to the general public?
Any relation to Facebook asking people's views on CHILD GROOMING?
>In today’s episode of ‘wtf was the tech industry thinking’, Facebook has been caught asking users if they think it’s okay for an adult man to ask a 14-year-old girl for “sexual pictures” in a private chat.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/05/facebook-says-it-mistakenly-asked-users-for-views-on-grooming/amp/
Who else censors with a pro-LGBTQ/pro-leftwing bias? Twitter? YouTube? Media Matters?
PizzaGate is not a surprise in this context.
No borders means easier time smuggling children across.
Why did Obama keep the children but deport the parents?
This isn't about 'left' or 'right': all people should be equally disgusted about pedophilia and the abuse of children.
#WalkAway shows the democorrupt party does not represent natural left views, but this weird, distorted extremist view.
Would you say that the policies being advocated by the extreme left are more akin to satanism? Weird perversions? Child abuse? The UN's 'Lucis Trust'? Child sacrifice? Deception? Gender a non-existent/imaginary concept? False accusations/slander?
Does not the democorrupt party take part in that? What did they call it again? 'Spirit cooking'?
Who could in good conscience defend a pedophile, knowing what they've done? Other pedophiles?
The weakening of the law is only ever called for by criminals. Why do they want to abolish ICE? Who are they really trying to protect? The low wage illegal immigrants… or themselves?
When Bill de Blasio said he was an illegal immigrant, is he not telling you that he's both corrupt and above the law?
That law enforcement are either powerless to stop him, or actively aid and abet him in that corruption?
Did not other high flying politicians also say they were or are illegal immigrants? Are they not also saying they are untouchable by the law, and thus a sign of massive corruption?
Why would they brag about breaking the law? What do psychopaths do?
Do you think, with their boasts about breaking the law, that they are, in-fact, explaining to you their motives for wanting to abolish ICE?
With no border checks, foreign powers can move into any state, and start intelligence operations to take over that country. Why are so many high flying politicians so eager to break the law, brag about it and get away with it?
Russian businessman sues for defamation of character, etc, aimed at FusionGPS, BuzzFeed and the Democrats, Judge has allowed it to pass, quoting:
>Mr. Gubarev’s lawyers will be allowed to ask about the hiring arrangement between Fusion and the Democrats and subsequently how Fusion contracted with Mr. Steele, a former British spy. Fusion will also be questioned on any communications with BuzzFeed and editor in chief Ben Smith.
>“The circumstances of the preparation of the December memo are highly relevant to the truth or falsity of the statements that are at the heart of this case,” Judge Ungaro’s ruling said.
>Gubarev can also ask Fusion about all the steps it and Mr. Steele took to obtain dossier information, but can not ask the identify of his Kremlin sources.
>Fusion must also turn over its electronic communication with Mr. Steele, with sources redacted.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/28/judge-orders-fusion-gps-deposition-libel-buzzfeed/
This WILL be fun.
NoName involvement alert:
>Outside of Fusion, a copy was known to exist in the hands of Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, who gave it to then-FBI Director James Comey in December 2016. A McCain associate, David Kramer, who met with Mr. Steele in England, also possessed the document.
Why would NoName give over dirt on a Republican candidate?
Traitor indeed.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/28/judge-orders-fusion-gps-deposition-libel-buzzfeed/
Above answers Q's question of who was in London, I do believe, and when.
>What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia?
Vault8:
>The three examples included in the source code build a fake certificate for the anti-virus company Kaspersky Laboratory, Moscow pretending to be signed by Thawte Premium Server CA, Cape Town.
https://wikileaks.org/vault8/#Hive
>One of the persistence mechanisms used by the CIA here is 'Stolen Goods' - whose "components were taken from malware known as Carberp, a suspected Russian organized crime rootkit." confirming the recycling of malware found on the Internet by the CIA
https://wikileaks.org/vault7/#Grasshopper
>The source code shows that Marble has test examples not just in English but also in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi. This would permit a forensic attribution double game, for example by pretending that the spoken language of the malware creator was not American English, but Chinese, but then showing attempts to conceal the use of Chinese, drawing forensic investigators even more strongly to the wrong conclusion
https://wikileaks.org/vault7/#Marble%20Framework
There's others, of course, but false attribution of attacks is as old as history, to genuinely think anyone would not falsely attribute an attack is to ignore history itself.