>>2060623

I think that's a major part. Trump's victories came at the hands of democrat failures - and by trying to blame everyone but themselves, they refuse to learn from their mistakes.

Essentially, the democrats argument is 'NO, YOU'RE WRONG', apparently:

1) 50% of the voter base is wrong

2) The election (that they've used for many decades without complaint) is wrong

3) The voter ID laws are wrong

4) The Russians are wrong

5) WikiLeaks are wrong

6) Your news sources are wrong

7) Bernie Sanders supporters are wrong

8) People opposed to Super PACs are wrong

9) Anyone who hates Hillary Clinton is a closet woman hating man (even the women!) and are wrong

10) Trump's tweets are wrong

…So on and so forth.

The democrats have proven themselves so incredibly tone-deaf that they underestimated a man who has had many years working in the entertainment industry…

…they purposefully shunned the wants of their own voter base (Bernie Sanders was a popular candidate - more popular than Hillary, and yet we hear the garbage about 'but Hillary was more popular than Trump' - nice selective application of popular there, you vote rigging bastards). By doing so, their own representatives voted against them in the Electorial College (because, surprise: they supported Bernie)…

…They ignored complaints of Super-PACs, corruption, vote rigging, which again disenfranchised the voter base. And now they're platforming extremist left-wing views that basically say 'ANARCHY FOR EVERYBODY! NO BORDERS! NO AGENTS! NO LAWS! REBBBBEEELLLL!' which is the kind of stupid shit I'd expect a 15 year old teenager with punk hair to do.

Essentially, their own arrogance in believing themselves always right, they got clobbered by a corporatist. If someone who is associated with the unpopular rich elite clobbers you in a popular vote, you know you are extremely unpopular.

And Trump is right, they are stupid. Their beratement of his '4th grade writing style' was a misnomer, because had they read any social studies, they would know people who use complex words or jargon, are seen as 'pretentious' - Trump was keeping his writings simple for the voter base. Something the democrats might consider when they go around trying to win over illiterate illegal immigrants who only understand pidgin English.

The man is only playing dumb. He didn't get rich by being dumb, though. And the democrats basically admit he won because he understood newer technologies better. It's why I think Q is Trump - the kind of play I'd expect from that guy.

Endlessly impressed by the fact an old man is upstaging everyone on the internet. Age certainly is no barrier.

—————–

"Trump campaign's digital team outperformed Democrats at every level"

• David Brock, Media Matters:

https://www.scribd.com/document/337535680/Full-David-Brock-Confidential-Memo-On-Fighting-Trump#from_embed

@Q/@Trump:

The EU is shortly going to attack you over 'Privacy Shield' (sharing of data between EU and the US). If you've followed my earlier request, you will have an EU attack plan standing by, if not, you're in for a world of hurt and will need to navigate carefully.

Basically, the EU want to update Privacy Shield to basically apply the overly aggressive GDPR to EU citizens data held in America: as a pro-privacy person, I support privacy overtures, but even GDPR sickens me as being far too aggressive, hamfisted, and poorly thought out.

GDPR obliges companies get permission to track, datamine or store people's data without the use of force (IE denial of the service) - which is a provision I agree with - but it also mandates users can request ANY and ALL data on them be deleted, which when it comes to data backups (read-only), is extremely impossible to perform. For the user, it's impossible to verify if it's been done.

If GDPR gets forced through into America, then it lays the groundwork for Article 11 (Link Tax) and Article 13 (Copyright filtration database, aka the censorship machine) to also be foisted onto EU parties who host within America.

This has an 'infective' attack vector in that if you erode EU citizens rights within America, it's a high incentive for America's corporations to bring Americans to the same system that the EU is using. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE - the tools the EU has are basically censorship tools. The link tax (Art. 11) has been tested in Germany and Spain and was a HUGE FAILURE.

Remember, the articles aren't going to be forced through immediately. If Privacy Shield dies, you lose European intel, but if you accept it, you lay the groundwork for Americans to lose their own freedom of speech rights on the internet.

You need to combat this with the proposed internet bill of rights. I've given a variety of drafts, you merely need to pick one and apply it. But without some way of taking down the EU - that corruption is going to slowly spread into the US. Corporations want their international data, so they will lobby for compliance with EU laws - and by indirection, the copyright and censorship provisions.

The EU has become a monstrosity. Not even people opposed to Brexit support Article 11 and Article 13. I think you'll find it's the one thing you have in common with liberals.

It must be taken out. It threatens the internet as a whole. Imagine your tweets subject to copyright laws. You quoted a famous line? Censored. You referenced a copyrighted video? Censored. You quoted a leaked document exposing corporate wrongdoing? Censored.

The nightmare is just beginning. The EU is a cancer. Italy is it's next weak point - they wanted to leave, but EU meddling has so far prevented that, please apply assistance there where possible.

—————–

"Trump campaign's digital team outperformed Democrats at every level"

• David Brock, Media Matters:

https://www.scribd.com/document/337535680/Full-David-Brock-Confidential-Memo-On-Fighting-Trump#from_embed

>>2073234

Only non-751 bread I can see is here:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2071275.html

Been stuck at that number since yesterday. Catalogue does not appear to be moving, and my suspicion the Qboard is under attack is growing.

>>2075851

Elements of truth.

The ID does represent the IP, but, the message, without a tripcode, should be rejected. From a security standpoint, a few considerations:

1) IPs can be spoofed. In theory you can just send a bunch of packets to Qboard under an IP that is not your own (this presumes the ID hash has been broken or Q's IP has been identified).

2) If Q uses a public or shared network resource (EG proxy, VPN, public wifi, mobile IP etc) which is far more likely (Q has a mobile), then the odds of the IP being shared with someone else is possible.

But again, this assumes the hash ID has been matched to an IP - which, if say, you were the NSA, would be possible (because the board displays the ID hash of the IP, you have both input - your own IP - and output - the hash - you could attack it from both sides).

The tripcode security is a bit dubious, and I would state, categorically, given the simplicity of the tripcode's design (based on Shift_JIS with self-referencing salt that is only two characters), that it should be, to any government agency, already broken.

If I had more resources (either CPU or manpower) or more time (brute forcing or devising a novel solution), I imagine I could break the tripcode system and my system tools are surprisingly underpowered. Q also has a bad habit of using complete words (not even 1337 speak) for passwords, which meant if I had a full English dictionary I imagine it could be broken that way.

Which reminds me, I must pull out the AES encryption functions I wrote for PHP and throw them at the BO.

Let BO know, but repeating link to code here if anyone is intrigued:

https://pastebin.com/Wy7hJZCF

The temporal salt is a hypothetical method of mitigating against man-in-the-middle attacks (especially if you document transmit timestamp and record receipt timestamp for discrepencies) - any delays means the message fails to decrypt, and any changes to the timestamp means the message leaves a papertrail compared to an audit table it's been tampered with.

Meaning if the message is delayed for too long, it tips off it's been intercepted. I hope to improve it's resolution to the seconds level. And if your machine clocks are out-of-sync, that isn't an issue with the encryption algorithm: your machine clocks should not be out of sync to begin with.

And no, this isn't the 'surprise' for the deep state I was talking about. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

(Also adds a layer of authentication to when a message was posted, so the timestamp salt has many applications)

————-

"Trump campaign's digital team outperformed Democrats at every level"

• David Brock, Media Matters:

https://www.scribd.com/document/337535680/Full-David-Brock-Confidential-Memo-On-Fighting-Trump#from_embed