Mildly surprised, came back expecting to answer rebuttals to my premises, but I assume people either think I'm a shill (and are following the ignore policy) or they think I'm correct (and don't disagree).
Obama calling anything legitimate or illegitimate is not the basis for decision making, because deceivers can double-bluff. I prefer to observe - if the Syrian, Libyan etc uprisings are Obama's supported objectives, then the Iranian one following the same format has to tell us it's more of the same.
The mullahs replaced the CIA stooge back in 1953: look into Operation Midnight.
However, Q's comments on so-called 'therapists' (handlers) regarding the shooters has my attention because he's espousing the MK-Ultra conditioning theory I've long suspected the shootings to actually be. This isn't something commonly espoused by conspiracy (they often go down the 'crisis actor' route).
This means Q knows what he's talking about (or he's been nabbing my research). Either way, warrants another dig.
Re: the coat of arms, it's Spanish:
"It may also occasionally have been an occupational name for a shepherd, or a house sign for someone who lived 'at the sign of the ram'."
http://www.4crests.com/ramos-coat-of-arms.html
Basically 'of the ram' could mean 'of the devil' (often said to have ram's legs or rams horns).
The same rough layout design can be seen utilised by several British figures, including 'Lord Pearson', so this might be global involving 'royals'.
As for the 'therapists' (handlers), they condition emotionally vulnerable or psychologically weak individuals (my research indicates individuals expressing the following 'traits' [note: I do not agree with psychological diagnosis] are targetted: schizophrenics [vulnerable to MPD], autistics [able to be conditioned to focus obsessively on one goal], MPD [split personality conditioning] and people suffering from moderate to major trauma).
The handlers use a variety of techniques (some of which I haven't yet deduced), from exploiting Stockholm Syndrome, to using hypnosis, to pre-existing fears or distortions on beliefs of reality in order to shape them to their own cause.
To my knowledge, there's only a limited number of handlers who specialise. They get paid - from the only confession I've seen - extremely well. They often indoctrinate celebrities (they are used for propaganda purposes, but if you ever see them 'go off the rails' it's because the conditioning is wearing off).
Usually, previous victims who survive long enough go on to become handlers. The handlers can be both male or female; my opinion is that female handlers use seduction. I've only encountered two male handlers so far indirectly.
Once you know what to look for, their techniques are pretty transparent. They use double-meanings, wordplay, or subversion of expectation of normal word usage (in Erickisonian hypnosis, it's known as a 'subconscious bypass' - you trick the conscious side into becoming confused enough to allow the subconscious to absorb the info).
A good example is the Ds own bullshit: 'we'll remember come november'. There's numerous layers to this: it's a subconscious reference to Guy Falkes rebellion against the British ('Remember, Remember the First of November'), or the gunpowder plot.
Most of you will have just been focused on the rhyming - that's the conscious foil (your conscious mind focuses on the rhyming, but your subconscious picks up the Guy Falkes reference).
Often, broken syntax, weird phrasing or something that 'bugs you' or 'catches your eye' will be said attempts (the fact it bugs you, is your subconscious way of warning you something is wrong).
Expect the handlers to have CIA ties.
I wouldn't be surprised if the ('medication') drugs was used to amplify such effects.
Oh yeah, suicide/shooting self is the 'Omega' personality (or the 'self-destruct' core). It's very difficult to disarm, it's protected by 'Gamma' personality (or the 'security' module). There can be multiple - and from what little I could glean from a victim, the cores can 'reinstate themselves', which is why you need one hell of a mind virus to compensate.
Anyway, back to my lame attempt at a boycott. I'll probably be back, given how compelling this shit is to read (perhaps a warning sign?).