>>15569030 pb
sorry, called away.
You don't need me to check the dough. You can check for yourself. What do you think? Look ok?
>>15569030 pb
sorry, called away.
You don't need me to check the dough. You can check for yourself. What do you think? Look ok?
tyb.
Dough has been reverted back to the form that i just corrected in the last bread. This is the second time.
Here is a corrected dough, plz use it:
https://controlc.com/50b244d4
>15569910
sorry for the mistake, computer very slow so could not check b4 end of bread. still needs a space as indicated here
can use current dough or mine, as long as there is a space before first bun.
o7
>https://controlc.com/50b244d4
has space
plz see
>15568669 Bakers - how to format notable buns for scraping NEW
Once upon a time, we had a dough whose format was the same from bread to bread. Then it was distorted in many ways, almost beyond recognition.
It's much harder to restore something than to create it in the first place.
First step was to restore GLOBALS, so there's a way to communicate across breads.
Next is to make sure that notable formatting is the same across breads, so scrapers can recognize the notable buns. That's where we're at now.
A third issue that is arising the BANNER - what it represents and should look like (or not look like). Will address that in a separate post.
But suffice it to say, we are making progress. It takes time if change is to be organic. Also, after a year and a half, have to see if what was done at that time is still what should be done now.
An example is the dough - which is now streamlined. Not recently but a few months ago. What was done recently was to update the resources in the resource thread so they are up to date. Still a work in progress.
yes, previous dough was always used. except when it wasn't sometimes (last few months).
when i learned to bake, bakers often had names or recognizable icons. some did not. famefagging bakers? ha ha ha ha.
bakering is a tough job. if there's any anons who want to take it on to become 'important' - go for it. The experience should prove interesting.
i did not bring anything like that up, if someone did, you'll need to talk to them. hivemind = disgruntled "ex employee(s)", so there's trubble. But nothing out of the ordinary. don't know about foot in the door. if board were smaller and i had more time, would follow every single bread. but cannot here, if there's anything specific, let me know.