>>156006

>Also relevant….every single anon in the old bread during Q posts…..all newfags. Shills or just newfags? I have noticed a great reduction in the "dialect" or the mannerisms of particular anons that have been so prominent in the first 65% of this Q journey.

May i ask how you identified them as newfags? Genuinely curious.

My autism isn't as weaponized as some of the other anons. I just try to recoup people and add positive vibes. Correcting known info and answering random questions.

But i do agree. The last few breads have been filled with "FOUND THE GLOW!!!" or "OMGH SHILLL!!" even against people asking genuine questions.

We the people, guys. Not "You the person". We cant attempt to redpill the masses if we're busy arguing amongst ourselves, refusing to answer questions or behaving like complete asshats.

>>156282

Nothing big. BO lawyered. Q posted a picture of a pen and a "white house" paper under it.

No new crumbs that i found. Some speculation about Pen meaning, Davos talk points.

and Correct me if im wrong, a 1 minute delta marker.

So somethings going on. Im just personally not sure at what.

>>156316

I have to agree that it was strange to link just that one video, i too got kinda flabbergasted at the channel name. As "berikande mångfald" is kinda a quip in sweden. A typical response when refugees do something bad.

Nothing is coincidence. So why is THAT video important? The view counter seems to be stuck. Could that mean anything? does he mean we're "stuck" ?

Is the message in the video (What trump is talking about) important? Is it to cement what we're discussing?

I usually feel there are more questions than answers regarding the drops. But future proves past. So SOMETHING in the FUTURE will prove what is going on now. I dont think diving into the details will work right now, but having a framework up and something to gaze on is more important. Kinda like the memo we have, we got titles of the chapters, but no words in them.

I dont know man. My autism is not strong enough :(

>>156519

Wouldn't using "super known names" be an indication that they know they're between a rock and a hard place?