Anonymous ID: 5bd473 Feb. 8, 2022, 1:48 a.m. No.15575418   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5439 >>5460 >>5656

>>15575312

Do not like

This falls under the category of small changes to endlessly debate about. In such a contest many cycles will be taken up for internal wankery that would be better used to meme the masses. Understand that it was nice when we had the single flag, then people invented problems of the lion meaning we had been subverted, then an underscore did not mean an underscore in the qanon vs q anon saga. We have been through all that shit and now there is some tribal understanding of what is OK and what is not, and it is barely ever mentioned beyond a failed fishing attempt. Humbly suggest you are trying to fix a problem that no longer exists.

Anonymous ID: 5bd473 Feb. 8, 2022, 2:01 a.m. No.15575464   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5472

>>15575439

The anons creating entries would be diverted from other things, that is what I meant. Who would judge such a contest? Was under the impression that we were not out of the tantrum tolerance phase of admin focus. Can see how such an endeavor, at this time, could be fuel for more dissent ops. Would have thought focus would be stability without tantrums at this time when things seem to be accelerating. Personal opinion on the flag is the classic with your pref of wording q or q anon or q_anon research with the lion area replaced with optional flair

Anonymous ID: 5bd473 Feb. 8, 2022, 3:14 a.m. No.15575656   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15575418

>invented problems of the lion meaning we had been subverted

>>15575587

>Q lead us to discover the spam bots were tracking new thread creation using the one banner.

Same thing and flawed logic, a simple regex on the title is all that is required to track new threads

>>15575634

>discussion was about posting on platforms like twitter and how to use camo to hide memes that would otherwise get deleted

Recalled correctly, in reaction to insta censorship of pic related.

https://pastebin.com/dLFvjM8D