BAKER
Regarding thisNOTABLE
>#19699 >>15578580
pic related
no sauce not notable
Should we hire nannies?
BAKER
Regarding thisNOTABLE
>#19699 >>15578580
pic related
no sauce not notable
Should we hire nannies?
>>>15578354 Are (You) connecting the dots? (CAP)
>>15578354 (pb) Are (You) connecting the dots? (CAP)
>Why would you post this
Did curiosity make you look?
Are you the Baker?
Was it addressed to you?
Do you know how to review notables?
Do you check bakers work?
Handle with care sayeth Q
>Thats not the Notable Baker Noted LYING SHILL
Not terribly sharp are you anon.
The point was to illustrate the cap had no sauce and images can be easily faked.
Dumbfuck
>no souce
There is no sauce provide with the screencap you halfwit fuck
Everyone you disagree with isn't a shill, go back to fucking reddit
>Here's your sauce.
Not included in the notable.
Drool moar faggot.
Baker should have included it in line with other sauce you provided not as a stand alone.
preferably with the sauce (twatter link)
fuck off and myob
>Pretty sure already been sauced anon, does the meme trigger you? they have safe spaces for that.
Didn't say anything about the information, has nothing to do with that.
Baker needs to put it with sauce on the same line, not as a stand alone.
<your new profile pic related
and you it was about the notable not the information pay attn