dChan
Anonymous ID: 95040f Feb. 8, 2022, 5:01 p.m. No.15581102   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1122 >>1139 >>1157 >>1209 >>1230 >>1335 >>1339 >>1389 >>1434 >>1457 >>1484 >>1486 >>1532 >>1541 >>1584 >>1596 >>1632 >>1664 >>1732 >>1782

"THE OG of being cancelled"

Owen Benjamin

was even cancelled by Joe Rogan the gatekeeper all are fawing over currently

so many don't truly understand who Joe Rogan is

or how he is handled

 

Owen warned at the time they all came for him, that if they alldid not stand up and fight it then, it would soon be at their footsteps

 

and here we are

 

NO word is special and all words MUST be allowed

or we get what we have 2022 and it wil get worse

 

we were all warned and Owen NEVER get credit for all he has beenthrough often and early

again

he warned us

 

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan are not to be lauded

the awakening is wonky

these two doods are not heros and history needs to be precise who they a really are in this movie

 

Owen needs to be a major part of the timeline

not just a footnote

real historians should document Owens part

and all of the events relating to him

and the current situations he ranted about long before we got here

as he was living it way back

 

Owen had MILLIONS of views

all scrubbed

anyting you find is false numbers as these are re-uploads of svaed videos

by his fans

Hopefully someday all will be restored

as they stole so much from him and tried to erase him

and the vultures came and stole all off c the carcass of his entire work history

buried, removed, deleted, cancelled

 

All must be restored someday

FOR everyone deleted

due to wrong think

wrong speak

 

more speech, even the gross and ugly, if you don't like it, change the channel, leave the area

you can kindly fuck off

 

 

Owen Benjamin | Who Stole My Bike Medley

https://youtu.be/-uvgUzccFFw

and the likes of Joe and Chappelle threw him out

Anonymous ID: 95040f Feb. 8, 2022, 5:11 p.m. No.15581209   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15581102

hahahaaa

so funny what YT has coming up next to this owen Jogger stolen bike vid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uvgUzccFFw

 

 

9:32

NOW PLAYING

2016 005 ADG Award Show Owen Benjamin

Art Directors Guild

12K views

5 years ago

 

6:40

NOW PLAYING

'The Five' reacts to Whoopi Goldberg threatening to quit

Fox News

1.9M views

2 days ago

New

 

kek

 

1:37:30

NOW PLAYING

Escape from the Planet of the Apes

YouTube Movies

1971 • Drama

Anonymous ID: 95040f Feb. 8, 2022, 5:24 p.m. No.15581339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1378 >>1389 >>1396

>>15581230

who cares

EVERY topic MUST be free to speak freely about

incliding Jews, Black, Crackers, spics, chinks,wops, you name it

say whatever about whatever and whomever

We are Americans

free speech is our birth right

 

no such thing as hate speech

 

and the supreme court re-affimed it no too long ago

 

look it up

 

fag

 

here: I will help you: https://firstamendmentwatch.org/slants-case-supreme-court-affirms-no-hate-speech-exception/

 

Supreme Court Affirms Hate Speech Protected

June 21, 2017

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/

 

The Volokh Conspiracy

Opinion: Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

 

 

From today’s opinion by Justice Samuel Alito (for four justices) in Matal v. Tam, the “Slants” case:

 

[The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but

the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”

 

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote separately, also for four justices, but on this point the opinions agreed:

 

A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.

 

And the justices made clear that speech that some view as racially offensive is protected

not just against outright prohibition but also against lesser restrictions.

 

 

>>15581102

>>15581139

Anonymous ID: 95040f Feb. 8, 2022, 5:27 p.m. No.15581389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1420

>>15581102

>>15581339

>>15581230

 

no such thing as hate speech

 

Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but

 

the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”

 

the justices made clear that speech that some view as racially offensive is protected

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/

Anonymous ID: 95040f Feb. 8, 2022, 5:46 p.m. No.15581584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1596

>>15581541

>>15581532

>>15581230

>>15581102

 

916

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 88957f No.613229 📁

Mar 10 2018 13:04:36 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 436341 No.613193 📁

Mar 10 2018 13:02:22 (EST)

C8F91EAD-51C7-47FA-96C5-C….jpeg⬇

 

>>613129

What about Awan.

Is Israel involved?

>>613193

We are saving Israel for last.

Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.

Q