>>15581133 (LB)

>>15581050 (PB)

A vaccine has a negative rate if it causes health issues.

For a hypothetical example, let's say a rabies vaccine prevents 98% of those who get the jab from getting rabies - that's a positive +98% effectiveness.

Now let's say another rabies vaccine doesn't prevent anyone from getting rabies, rather it CAUSES 98% of the jabees to get rabies - that's a negative -98% effectiveness.

But if that last rabies shot not only causes rabies in the jabees, but the jabees spread the rabies once they get it to others not jabbed, then the percentage is greater than 100%, depending on how many others acquire rabies unjabbed. So those who were jabbed, let's say 100%, get rabies, then spread rabies to others unjabbed at an average rate of 4.8 persons per spreader, then the vaccination rate would be -480%.

Capice?

Chinaflu vaxxed not only acquire Chinaflu themselves, but once jabbed, spread Chinaflu to others who aren't vaxxed. That's why they're not so worried about people not getting vaxxed; they're confident that the vaxxed will spread it to those of us who refuse the jab.