RE: proposal to have a contest to chose a single image for General breads

>>15581462 pb

>This is a fucking battlefield

>if we do a content, will include the banner posted, it might win

>And it's spelled contest.

>Win the fucking war.

I suppose you could think of a contest as a war

it IS a competition of ideas

but that is what our country is built on: the freedom to win a competition of ideas

we do it everyday on this board

diggers "compete" for notables

ideally, the best ones "win"

is that a problem?

>>15581521

>Yes, bring back the Q_ANONbanner.

>I dare you to do it.

Why dare? Best to make a proposal and let people say their peace. WWG1WGA.

>>15581546

>Q vs Q_ANON

If it came down to that, could present both and see if there's a strong consensus either way.

>>15581558

>I believe that is one of the reasons they constantly changed it. To make it more difficult for people that just come here to quickly look at notables.

Possibly - at least originally. But probably not know. There is intention and there is effect, tho. Have to look at where we're at now. And where we want to go in the future.

still catching up, may reply to more if they are below in pb bread

>>15581152 pb

You're right in how OSS took over the board. It was me barkeep and anime because comms were being total dicks to everybody.

>The 'foot in the door' for OSS was not barkeep or anime or me, it was comms being comms. Get the story straight. As for the banner, it was changed not to subvert but because fakenews was beating the qanon drum and the banner literally said qanon.

Not what you said at the time.

>Now that we got that out of the way. One banner to rule them all is fine. This should be done quickly because quite frankly there are truckers sleeping in their trucks with their families trying to win back freedom and that should be our focus, not how cute the fucking banner looks.

Want to talk. See OP meta for email.

So, whatever you want to do BO is fine with me as long as we do it and move on.

>>15581828 pb

>And here we are arguing over banners.

>Regardless of the decision, shills are going to use this to division fag for the next couple weeks.

Yes, shills will use this to divison fag.

That is how they broke the board in the first place - finding wedge issues and exploiting.

Does not mean we should never discuss issues that come up.

Seems to me that anons are pretty good at distinguishing shill arguments from anon argument at this point.

KEK

>>15582194

>So, whatever you want to do BO is fine with me as long as we do it and move on.

barkeep's comment, i screwed up the formatting

>>15582248

that'd sure capture certain aspect of the board

KEK

artistic at least…..

>>15581926

>comms just a practice board

right.

comms is just a board developed by a baker for supporting bakers and allowing them to discuss stuff. anyone can use for practices. there were also baking classes there. still used for practicing baking (although interest in baking waned after new bakers got shot down as comp'd once they got good at baking).

if everyone who tried was "comp'd", would explain why QR never had any bakers after a while. Some kind of accident?

>>15582321

>this discussion a distraction

I post digs every day, anon.

World around us matters.

So does this board.

>>15582380

BO IS floating an idea….

this is whole new way of working

admins now here are anons too

workin' fags

hard to query anons due to shills - who are always very loud, anons often hang back bc WWG1WGA. on boards where there are no shills, it's different

but on QR, always a shill rodeo