Anonymous ID: 6780af Feb. 8, 2022, 10:31 p.m. No.15583540   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>15583513

Seems like more division faggotry.

 

https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-1?r=17d7ph&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

 

https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-2?r=17d7ph&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

 

https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-3?r=17d7ph&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Anonymous ID: 6780af Feb. 8, 2022, 10:50 p.m. No.15583594   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3675

Elon Musk’s satellite internet service Starlink just got dealt an expensive blow — the company’s currently estimating that 40 of the 49 Starlink satellites it launched on February 3rd will be destroyed because of a geomagnetic storm.

 

The storm caused “up to 50 percent higher drag than during previous launches,” keeping the deployed satellites from reaching their proper orbit around the Earth. And while Starlink tried to fly them “edge-on (like a sheet of paper)” to reduce that drag, it now looks like as many as 40 of them will burn up in the Earth’s atmosphere instead of reaching their destinations.

 

SpaceX recently crossed the 2,000 satellite launch milestone, and has plans to launch 12,000 if not a great many more — so losing 40 of them might not be a huge deal in the grand scheme of things. Still, that’s the vast majority of an entire Falcon 9 rocket’s Starlink launch capacity burning up in the atmosphere.

 

https://www.theverge.com/2022/2/8/22924561/spacex-starlink-satellites-geomagnetic-storm