>Thought all along that H gave his results to Durham
What did we learn this week?
-
Durham 'true' start?
-
Durham 'take-over' HUBER[select parts re: CF-i]?
Does WHITAKER also oversee HUBER+ OIG?
What case(s) is HUBER+ OIG + team of 470 currently working on?
Who has the server(s)?
Who has access to NSA UT Term1-12?
Does FISA grant access to NSA umbrella collection?
You are witnessing something [firsthand] that many cannot possibly comprehend or accept as reality [Sci-Fi or precision M_planning?]
Coincidences > > reveal w/o violating NAT SEC
Coincidences > > mathematically impossible to be 'FALSE'
Coincidences > > bypass 'installed' restrictions to prevent future legal attachments
Comms understood? 5:5?
What if there's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
Q
But… interestingly, if nothing is being done behind the scenes, why are there 50,000+ sealed indictments across the US [what % = USA v. X?]? Coincidence vs. HUBER start?