TikTok Says They Are Cracking Down on Users 'Misgendering' or 'Dead Naming' Transgender People
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/tiktok-says-cracking-users-misgendering-dead-naming-transgender-people/
It is hate speech to slander and smear people as posters of 'hate speech' for speaking consistently with a person's birth gender.
It is hate speech to slander and smear people as posting 'hate speech' for speaking consistently with a person's LIVING name they were given by their legal guardians/parents at birth. "Dead naming" is itself a slander and smear against a person's legal guardian who took care of them while they were newborns.
It is hate speech to slander and smear people as posters of 'hate speech' for speaking consistently with proven biological facts.
It is hate speech to slander and smear people as posters of 'hate speech' for questioning or disagreeing with the logically fallacious and internally contradictory philosophy of 'identity politics'.
If the human SELF is the sole determining originator of truth of 'identity', which is what every single one of the 'pro' identity politics pundits insist is the case for every instance of a man calling himself a woman, or a white person calling themselves a black person, then there is an unavoidable contradiction: What is the implication when there are two consciousness with the following 'self-identities':
-
A person 'self-identifying' as pro science insists on viewing themselves as capable of knowing that, for example, the person born as Bruce Jenner was born as and has since been a man.
-
A person 'self-identifying' as 'Kaitlyn Jenner' insists that person 1. views themselves as 'wrong' for 'self-identifying' themselves as capable of knowing that Bruce Jenner never was and never will be a woman.
Both can't be true at the same time.
This explanation above is, by the way, a deliberate gotcha for those who think they have a gotcha by thinking that the above is totally stupid and wrong, because 'duh', person number 1 has to be wrong because they are 'rejecting' person 2.'s 'self-identity', which is, allegedly, the only 'actual' identity 'under consideration' here, right?
Wrong bitches!
Now you know why I wrote the gotcha in the way I did, because in actual fact it isn't a gotcha after all to anyone with a clear mind, because when you have ANY instance of at least TWO consciousness, each having their OWN 'self-identity', either neither can demand that the other view their own identities any differently than they do, i.e. 'pro-biology identity' and 'I feel like I'm not a man identity', or, both must accept each other's self-identity and let the chips fall where they may.
Either both Person 2 CANNOT demand that Person 1 deny their own 'identity' of knowing biological truth, AND at the same time, Person 1 CANNOT demand that Person 2 deny their own 'identity' of calling themselves a woman, or, both can speak their own identities and if those identities do not 'match'….then that's OK! We're not all the same consciousness!
Oopsy, poof goes the entire NeoMarxist Frankfurt School.
And here's the ultimate gotcha:
Neither HAS to demand the other think in any particular way, for in the world of free information…there is no real infringement on anyone's persons. What does tend to happen though is that most everyone 'naturally' gravitates towards 'truth'.
The reason Tik Tok is slandering and smearing posters who self-identify as pro-biology and capable of knowing when a man is a man and not a woman, is because they want to sneak in their own hate speech through the back door by slandering and smearing those who know and are not afraid to speak consistently with the science of biology.
They are attacking biology, they are attacking science, just like what the Stalin Regime did in communist Russia where tens of millions of people, including scientists, were slaughtered.
Public class TikTok extends CCP implements Marxism