This woman prays.

BREAKING: Leaked Internal Email from ESPN Customer Care Manager Stephen McDonald copy/pastes misleading Wikipedia description to falsely label Project Veritas.

Employees instructed to "not engage on any social media posts" regarding #ExposeESPN video exposing racism within the workplace

https://gab.com/ProjectVeritas/posts/107770283019603082

Cancers coming back with a vengeance is very common after the COVID vax

If I had a dollar for every person who has related a story about a friend whose cancer was in remission before the COVID jabs, then became uncontrollable shortly after the jab, I could retire…

The DMED database shows the rate of cancer is up by 3X after the COVID vaccines rolled out. See ACT OF WAR: Thanks to COVID “vaccines,” the military’s cancer rate has more than TRIPLED

In talking with Ryan Cole about this, he believes this is primarily due to accelerating existing cancers (ones people already know they have or recent cancers that people never realized were there) rather than creating new cases of cancer.

Consider these two emails I received on February 5, 2022 which are representative of comments I see all the time:

I watched the Second Opinion and was wondering if you found any information on something that was talked about. The topic I am interested in is the untranslated human genes added to the MRNA vaccines that were being discussed as possibly adversely affecting how the immune system goes after cancer cells–in order to reduce the inflammatory response to the vaccine. I have seen several articles published with case studies of specific patients who had a massive progression of their cancer post vaccine.

and

I know two people personally who now have a cancer that's pretty serious… I was talking to my doc yesterday and she said one of her patients was diagnosed on Monday and dead by Thursday last week.. she had no previous cancer…

[Continued]

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/cancers-coming-back-with-a-vengeance

Some completely random facts for folks to assemble at home.

• The mRNA genetic code injections are causing cancer.

• It appears that all Federal inmates received the one of mRNA code injections.

• Ted Kaczynski has never been a fan of technology encroaching on human life.

• Ted Kaczynski is a Federal inmate.

• Ted Kaczynski received the mRNA code injection.

• Ted Kaczynski is dying of cancer.

https://gab.com/eschatologuy/posts/107769283449538342

Pfizer's new drug, is the same drug that treats HIV. It stems from the drug AZT which this Dr claims gives you HIV. Lots of name changes to disguise its roots

https://gab.com/Guild/posts/107769747072720469

High V, Low M

I sent the message below to a social scientist I know who (like many, perhaps understandably) is confused about Stephen J. Gould's status as an evolutionary theorist. Many Gould readers are surprised to learn that his main expertise was the paleontology of snails and that he struggled with higher mathematics. When I first encountered Gould's essays as a kid, I concluded that there was just no there there. He was all literary flourish and little depth.

Which brings me to an observation I've been meaning to write about. It is that high verbal ability (which Gould certainly had) is useful for appearing to be smart, or for winning arguments and impressing other people, but it's really high math ability that is useful for discovering things about the world – that is, discovering truth or reasoning rigorously. The importance of math ability manifests in two distinct ways:

1. Powerful (deep) models of Nature (e.g., electrodynamics or evolutionary theory) are themselves mathematical. Most of the incredible progress in our understanding of the universe is just not available to people who do not understand math. For example, we can talk until we are blue in the face about the Uncertainty Principle, but there is no precise understanding without actual equations.

1. The statistical techniques used to analyze data obtained in a messy, complex world require mathematical ability to practice correctly. In almost all realistic circumstances hypothesis testing is intrinsically mathematical. It is quite easy to fool yourself statistically if you don't have strong math ability, but rather are simply following cookbook recipes.

High verbal ability is useful for more than just impressing others it typically implies a certain facility with concepts and relationships between ideas but high V alone is a dangerous thing. The most confused people I meet in the academy tend to be high V, low (modest) M types.

More on the V / M split in this longitudinal study of gifted children (SMPY / SVPY – see esp. figure 4).

Gould on Gould (NY Review of Books, March 29 1984):

"I am hopeless at deductive sequencing… I never scored particularly well on so-called objective tests of intelligence because they stress logical reasoning …"

This is from the email I sent to a colleague:

Gould appeals to high V low M people who do not actually understand evolutionary theory at a mathematical level. He never made any important contribution to evolutionary theory other than as a popularizer.

Note this is distinct from his deliberate obfuscation of topics like IQ in Mismeasure of Man. He wrote some incorrect things there about factor and statistical analysis, but perhaps those distortions were intentional. See The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias.

Paul Krugman:

Now it is not very hard to find out, if you spend a little while reading in evolution, that Gould is the John Kenneth Galbraith of his subject. That is, he is a wonderful writer who is beloved by literary intellectuals and lionized by the media because he does not use algebra or difficult jargon. Unfortunately, it appears that he avoids these sins not because he has transcended his colleagues but because he does does not seem to understand what they have to say; and his own descriptions of what the field is about - not just the answers, but even the questions - are consistently misleading. His impressive literary and historical erudition makes his work seem profound to most readers, but informed readers eventually conclude that there's no there there. (And yes, there is some resentment of his fame: in the field the unjustly famous theory of "punctuated equilibrium", in which Gould and Niles Eldredge asserted that evolution proceeds not steadily but in short bursts of rapid change, is known as "evolution by jerks").

What is rare in the evolutionary economics literature, at least as far as I can tell, is references to the theorists the practitioners themselves regard as great men - to people like George Williams, William Hamilton, or John Maynard Smith. This is serious, because if you think that Gould's ideas represent the cutting edge of evolutionary theory (as I myself did until about a year and a half ago), you have an almost completely misguided view of where the field is and even of what the issues are.

[Continued]

https://infoproc.blogspot.com/2011/06/high-v-low-m.html