https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1491612907964096513?s=20&t=5s39GNQFrONqj1MgMVteXg
Total donations as of 7:27 am Feb 10, 2023
Goal : USD $16,000,000
Raised : USD $8,137,723
https://givesendgo.com/FreedomConvoy2022?sharemsg=display
Good news pedo goes to jail. Bad news only 15 years
https://twitter.com/AnOpenSecret/status/1491639076939780097?s=20&t=5s39GNQFrONqj1MgMVteXg
Loudoun County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office hired a registered sex offender
Lindsay WattsFebruary 9, 2022
Loudoun prosecutor hires convicted sex offender. Loudoun County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office hired a registered sex offender convicted on a child pornography charge. The man who was hired and then fired days later agreed to an interview.
LEESBURG, Va. - Loudoun County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office hired a registered sex offender convicted of a child pornography charge – shocking prosecutors working in the office at the time.
Through a Freedom of Information Act request, Loudoun County confirmed the man was hired as a paralegal but refused to confirm the date or length of employment, citing a Virginia code on personnel records.
The man, who was hired and then fired days later, agreed to an interview. While his mug shot, name, and address are publicly available on the Virginia sex offender registry, FOX 5 agreed to only use his first name, John, as he tries to rebuild his life after five years in prison.
He said when federal investigators showed up at his house in 2013, he had been struggling with mental illness and became obsessed with collecting pornography on the internet.
"I would end up with hundreds, and then it became thousands of files of various types, both adult, child … Sometimes pretty horrific stuff," he said.
John said he started studying law and helping fellow inmates with legal issues while he was incarcerated from 2014 to 2019. He applied to the commonwealth’s attorney’s office last year.
"I thought it would be a great opportunity to use my paralegal skills," he said.
In March 2021, he said he was hired and was told to come in the next day.
"I was kind of surprised how quickly the process went," John said. "And I was expecting there to be the background check, of course. Everyone does a background check these days."
Days after FOX 5’s exclusive report on concerns from inside Loudoun County’s Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, top prosecutor Buta Biberaj held a "State of Justice" address.
"But instead it turned into, ‘Here’s your badge, here’s all the access you need for the computers,’ and things just kind of went rolling from there," he said. "I would immediately start working on different cases and had immediate access to the files."
He said he was fired a few days later. Sources working in the commonwealth’s attorney’s office at the time tell FOX 5’s Lindsay Watts that it was John’s probation officer who called to confirm his employment and that’s how his sex offender status was discovered.
John said he had been texting with his probation officer after he was issued a computer and access to case files prompting concern from his probation officer.
FOX 5 talked to former prosecutors who were stunned by what happened. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because of continued work in the legal field.
"I thought it was wild, but it was also expected," said a former prosecutor. "That office is just chaos with the high turnover, lack of experience, and poor management."
That person also said: "I did not get a background check."
A long-time prosecutor said that paralegals have free access to years of past cases, including sex crimes.
"He had access to every closed case for a number of years," the person said.
Commonwealth’s Attorney Buta Biberaj wouldn’t answer questions about what happened, but provided a statement:
"Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney (OCA) cannot comment on personnel matters. Applicants for employment are reviewed through established Loudoun County Human Resources processes. Thereafter, the applicants are referred to OCA. Candidates submit to a vetting process. All offers of employment are contingent on, and subject to, a background check, and a probationary period. If a candidate is deemed inappropriate, our office takes immediate action to rectify any concerns."
John says he was sent to the sheriff’s office for fingerprinting, but only after he started work. He said it was Biberaj who called him in to fire him.
"She had stated what my offense was and had told me that I should’ve disclosed it to them," he said. "They thought it was inappropriate that I would go into their office and start working with a felony offense."
He said he’s tried to immediately disclose his sex offender status while job hunting, but it has caused him to be immediately disqualified.
John said he has applied for hundreds of jobs but remains unemployed.
https://twitter.com/iandprior/status/1491609862106660869?s=20&t=5s39GNQFrONqj1MgMVteXg
Habbening
https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1491621737620029440?s=20&t=5s39GNQFrONqj1MgMVteXg
American Patriot Flag of United States Eagle @MichaelDeLauzon
TRUTH: President Trump did restore the Republic. Now it’s up to us.
President Trumprestored the Republic in 2019 by EO. Never forget this
Short Video is fascinating
https://twitter.com/MichaelDeLauzon/status/1491624475032383488?s=20&t=5s39GNQFrONqj1MgMVteXg
https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1491626470900477952?s=20&t=95CADO7MozK0NCyOiukPKA
Reminder
il Donaldo Trumpo
😂😂😂
https://t.co/llPH4awzPI
9:36 PM · Feb 9, 2022·Twitter Web
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1491601969018028034?s=20&t=CKZ3rOOwFdx8I4vmHD2Fzw
Regarding thr video and Speakers, I read the Trump EOS in June 2019 and 2020
no where do I see President Trump in the prologue of EOs does it say United States of America, I take back (for the Republic).
I’m also reading through otherEOs to see if that statement the speaker makes in the video, he says “as president of the US of America takes back. I find no proof this far President Trump did this==.
But we do know he bankrupted the corporation of the US of America!
Sample
PUBLISHED DOCUMENT
Executive Order 13925 of May 28, 2020
Preventing Online Censorship
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. Free speech is the bedrock of American democracy. Our Founding Fathers protected this sacred right with the First Amendment to the Constitution. The freedom to express and debate ideas is the foundation for all of our rights as a free people.
In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand pick the speech that Americans may access and convey on the internet. This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power. They cease functioning a s passive bulletin boards, and ought to be viewed and treated as content creators.
The growth of online platforms in recent years raises important questions about applying the ideals of the First Amendment to modern communications technology….
Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube wield immense, if not unprecedented, power to shape the interpretation of public events; to censor, delete, or disappear information; and to control what people see or do not see.
As President, I have made clear my commitment to free and open debate on the internet. Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes. It is essential to sustaining our democracy.
Online platforms are engaging in selective censorship that is harming our national discourse. Tens of thousands of Americans have reported, among other troubling behaviors, online platforms “flagging” content as inappropriate, even though it does not violate any stated terms of service; making unannounced and unexplained changes to company policies that have the effect of disfavoring certain viewpoints; and deleting content and entire accounts with no warning, no rationale, and no recourse.
Twitter now selectively decides to place a warning label on certain tweets in a manner that clearly reflects political bias…
At the same time online platforms are invoking inconsistent, irrational, and groundless justifications to censor or otherwise restrict Americans' speech here at home, several online platforms are profiting from and promoting the aggression and disinformation spread by foreign governments like China. One United States company, for example, created a search engine for the Chinese Communist Party that would have blacklisted searches for “human rights,” hid data unfavorable to the Chinese Communist Party…They have also amplified China's propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.
As a Nation, we must foster and protect diverse viewpoints in today's digital communications environment where all Americans can and should have a voice. We must seek transparency and accountability from online platforms, and encourage standards and tools to protect and preserve the integrity and openness of American discourse and freedom of expression.
Sec. 2. Protections Against Online Censorship. (a) It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet. Prominent among the ground rules governing that debate is the immunity from liability created by section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act (section 230(c)). 47 U.S.C. 230(c). It is the policy of the United States that the scope of that immunity should be clarified: the immunity should not extend beyond its text and purpose to provide protection for those who purport to provide users a forum for free and open speech, but in reality use their power over a vital means of communication to engage in deceptive or pretextual actions stifling free and open debate by censoring certain viewpoints…..
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/06/02/2020-12030/preventing-online-censorship
Reptiles can get Covid, thats hard to believe
>https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1491582230216548357?s=21
Part of thread, well worth reading, lots of videos
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant. 11h
-
Trudeau has no clue what to do. He's losing his cool. He's losing voters. He's even losing his MPs. Only the fools at the Ottawa Police and the Media Party are still marching with him. Gerald Butts is panicking – he's lashing out and suing critics.
Dr Jordan B Peterson
@jordanbpeterson · 16h
My defence is firmly in place, legal and financial, so we'll both get a chance to air our dirty laundry. And I wouldnt count on having too much to donate to your charitable cause when the smoke clears. twitter.com/gmbutts/status…
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant 11h
-
But look at this! Vice President Jen Psaki (I think that's her title) was asked about the truckers. And she didn't do a Butts. She didn't smear or slander or attack. In fact, she seemed to praise the truckers and pretend Joe Biden was one of them!
Quote Tweet
Danny De Urbina@dannydeurbina
· Feb 8
Psaki tries and fails miserably at gaslighting on hero Canadian truckers— dismissing their MASSIVE protest as "sporadic congestion and blockages" and "not related" to the vaccine mandate
They think you're stupid.
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant. 11h
-
For all her flaws VP Psaki can control her emotions, unlike Trudeau and Butts. Trudeau thought demonizing truckers somehow made him look better, so he doused the fire with kerosene. Psaki was conciliatory and friendly. Why?
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant
·11h
-
Again, because she can control her emotions. She doesn't have a vendetta against Canadian truckers like Trudeau does. She just doesn't want the Trucker Spring to spread to the U.S. She doesn't want the political optics. She doesn't want the economic carnage. She's a grown-up.
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant·11h
-
Imagine what a trucker rebellion would do in the U.S. Supply chain mess. Inflation. Unemployment. Visual proof of Biden's economic failure on TV every night. Alienating working class voters Biden needs so desperately this November.
Trudeau's mess is creeping over the bridge.
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant·11h
-
But the truckers are already changing the political climate. Half a dozen Democrat states just ended mask mandates. Democrats are looking for a graceful exit for Fauci. Biden doesn't need this staring contest. And here, I predict, is how this ends:
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant·11h
-
Biden gets the CDC to announce that The ScienceTrade mark sign has evolved again, and St. Fauci now says truckers don't need to be vaccinated to cross the border. Biden's policies are working so well, they can be retired already! Biden is a friend of the working man
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant. 11h
-
Biden saves the day. He saves jobs. He's normalizing America! And the Teamsters will praise him. And because he didn't demonize the truckers, he won't lose face.
But all cross-border trucks do round trips. So if Biden ends the vaccine mandate, Trudeau has to, as well.
Ezra Levant Maple leafArticulated lorry@ezralevant·11h
-
You can't have a cross-border vaccine mandate in one direction. Biden will move, Trudeau will follow. He'll say it was for Canada-U.S. relations, and that it wasn't because of those racist, sexist, Nazi truckers.
But of course, it will be. And everyone will know it….
https://mobile.twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1491582230216548357?s=21