>We need a system of vigilance for vetting bakers.
We already have this. It's called archiving offline.
Don't even think about floating a bakers union, that was tried and failed in the wayback.
>We need a system of vigilance for vetting bakers.
We already have this. It's called archiving offline.
Don't even think about floating a bakers union, that was tried and failed in the wayback.
>f19137 you admitted you're a slider.
Whatever makes you feel better. Was telling you that people will not click your shit whether the BO allows pdf links or not, because, duh, it's a fucking pdf.
Suit yourself and keep posting pdf's instead of something safer if you want nobody to read it, assmunch ;)
Fuck off with your projection. I was concerned for you and your precious material!
..And that it won't get the proper face time it deserves.. /s
Because you're funny. Not the ha ha kind, either.
Your mother was a hamster, and you father smelled of elderberries!
''If you respond to me again I shall taunt you a second time.''
Besides the idea that you can clearly see the bold texted name fagging in the screenshot…
These people are really really stupid.