>>15611094 (lb)

There's a lot of truth in this post, but perhaps a lot of misconception based on perception. Every religion in existence is an attempt to reconcile the subjective human experience with an objective belief system. The problem with objective belief systems are they are contradictory in terms when attempting to reconcile unknowns. That's where allegory and typology come in to play. A person could read the bible, for example, take it literally cover to cover, apply what they've learned through that perspective, and still live a fruitful life. Now take someone that translates everything in the bible figuratively (all of it), and they, too, could come away with not only deeper meanings behind the narratives, but come to the realization that some sort of moral system that relies heavily on iconography for inspiration is essential for a functioning society. So they would "endorse" from an entirely different perspective.

What (if anything) happens after this life is completely unknowable. Near death experiences are a release of DMT in the system which causes hallucinations and for some those experiences are sublime. Others, not so much. As Ben Franklin once said, "A clear conscious is a continual Christmas." This is a true statement, subjectively, and in many ways (observably) objectively. Having said that, there's no evidence to support any claim to anything hereafter; if such a thing exists. I think (believe) there are enough patterns to prove the existence of a higher form of life with intent. When you take that into consideration, what's most important is how to maintain civility by choice, and when you factor in free will, we learn we only ever have free will to exercise choices over our subjective experience and not over an objective reality; again, if such a thing even exists.

When more people wake to the Truths of control systems and step out to start living a truer-to-self existence, we will see humanity progress to points that existed only in our imaginations previously.