Anonymous ID: 0621c7 May 27, 2018, 6:19 p.m. No.1561779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1813

>>1561751

Let's say that this WERE true…

#1 the deep state would be deeply desperate to have tried, with no guarantee that we would follow suit

#2 Oh, we're dangerous to the deep state, how cute, what a compliment!

#3 I'm not sure ho research against the deep state helps them to server their aims. I'll read that thread & see if/how they managed to reconcile that one

Anonymous ID: 0621c7 May 27, 2018, 6:29 p.m. No.1561861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2404

>>1561813

THe thread is here, and, it's biased toward JA as though Q & anons are against JA (and @Snowden and @KimDotCom)…makes it seem as though these 3 alone are the worst enemies of the deep state. Kind of a weak argument, and where her theory/motives begins to fall apart.

 

4b. This is where Q's stated motives begin to fall apart. We don't even have to ask who benefits. We can just start asking some other really basic questions. Who does the Deep State want dead or in jail, more than anyone else? Edward Snowden, Julian Assange & Kim Dotcom.

 

https://twitter.com/Suzi3D/status/1000060738923319296