A different take on the 11.3 marker.

One of the leading possibilities of what the 11.3 marker may relate to is the section 11.3 in the DoD Law of War manual which covers the law relating to occupation by belligerent forces, more specifically when such an occupation end: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190

The majority of the commentary I’ve read around this possibility suggests that this marker must relate to the Biden administration occupying the USA as a belligerent force, and while there looks to be evidence to support this thesis - military presence in DC around inauguration etc - Q has told us that multiple meetings exist with their postings.

How about this as a different possibility? The 11.3 marker does relate to the law of war but the belligerent force is Russia and the country being occupied is the Ukraine.

Think about this, the DoD Law of War manual is based on international law relating to war, and while Russia will no doubt have their own version of a DoD-style manual, the law as stated in the DoD manual is the same law that Russia would be expected to follow if they invade and occupy Ukraine.

Is there any suggestion that Russia would occupy Ukraine? Well, it certainly seems to be part of the narrative that’s being currently propagated, eg https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/13/russias-fsb-agency-engineering-coups-ukrainian-cities

Bringing this all together you’d have a ‘scare event, i.e. WW3 and the 11.3 marker when any Russian occupation of Ukraine ended.