I think Q was referring to the US with the 11.3 marker.
My take is the belligerent occupier must maintain social order. Along with that, the occupier's military can't be used to effect social order. Military is not LE. That's my own theory, and it may not be correct. It's basically a conditional that explains, to me, the current battle in the US domestically.
In essence, I think the Brandon gang is trying to foment violent protests in order to be able to insert their own military operation into civilian life in order to maintain control legally. Q, OTOH, is a counter operation of a loyal US military designed to keep a violent uprising from happening. The Q operation wants a controlled and peaceful descent of the US social structure into a state of ineffectiveness, which would trigger the insertion of the loyal US military into civilian life, also legally. By legally, I'm talking about International Law. I think International Law, at this point, is just an extension of US civilian law, and controlled by a deep pocketed power elite. It would be used as PR tool WW to condemn any loyal military intervention. A PITA situation that is just best to avoid.
I think Canada, NZ and Australia are the first targets of a loyal military operation. 5 eye payback. The social fabric will become unglued, due in part to over the top, but ineffective LE measures and a loyal military will be able, legally, to insert themselves in daily life in order to restore order. The military would suspend the power of the civilian courts, and sort out the trouble spots in the failed government so that order is restored and an new civilian government can be formed after the clean up.