>>1563361

>going to destroy Chelsea's senate run

Very good point, and as some others have noted it is sad. We have to take off our "liberal/conservative" glasses to see certain things clearly, and a whistleblower like Manning is a perfect example.

Anyone who gets elected to the Senate from Maryland is going to be a fucked up person. Period. With Manning, at least there was a chance the person could go against the grain on some issues. Odd as he/she may be, the heart seems to be in the right place and perhaps would support POTUS on some important matters.

Or to put it differently, a senator from Maryland is going to oppose President Trump 99% of the time. Chelsea Manning maybe only 75% of the time.

>>1563232

Why does #1964 Notables contain these?

>>1562552 , >>1562591 , >>1562636 Inaugural donors: The Adelsons

>>1562949 What is the "keystone"?

There is nothing remotely notable or interesting about them, nor do they have any relevance to anything at qresearch.

Baker if you only have a few Notables don't sweat it, just list items of value even if there are few of them.

Next baker should trim that BS off the list.

Thank you.

>>1563785

Thanks for replying but you missed my point.

I know about the keystone, but the anon whose post was made "Notable" wrote something unironically retarded about the keystone.

Please check for yourself. It does not belong in the bread:

>>1562949 What is the "keystone"?

>>1563819

ok cheers, anon