>how could you be this mad about not getting a post into notables?
>>chill the fuck out
I agree with what you're saying.
Don't like the idea of anons suggesting their own posts be notables or of others lobbying for a notable, either. That's shill territory and has become a distraction, IMO.
A notable should be organic, based on the reaction to the information provided. Anons pick up on pertinent information and it becomes obvious that a post has added meaningful direction.
I think we just let whomever is responsible for choosing notables do their job, as it was done in the beginning. If notables as a whole become skewed in any way, anons will pick up on it and it will be addressed accordingly.
TL;DR no bitching about specific posts being notable; make sure notables as a whole don't develop an obvious skew.