>>15643632
>https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-white-house-spying
Bwahahaha that ain't no 'debunking'!
Key components of the shit article justifying the claim of 'debunking':
>as the Times notes: (1) Sussmann’s conversation with the CIA had already been reported last October (2) Durham never once said anything about the White House being “infiltrate[d]” (3) the special counsel also never claimed the Clinton campaign had paid Joffe’s company and (4) perhaps most importantly, “the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era.” In fact, lawyers for the data scientist who helped develop the data analysis in question, say this happened during— wait for it—Barack Obama’s presidency.
None of this is contradictory evidence to Durham's filing.
What Durham 'didn't say' isn't proof of what Clinton's allies are saying now.
>attorneys Jody Westby and Mark Rasch told the Times: “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, "wE WeRe jUsT 'iNvEsTiGaTiNg mALwaRe aT thE wHiTe hOuSe!…and…and…iT wAs oBaMa's fAuLT!"
These people are totally and absolutely fucked.