dChan
Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 8:41 a.m. No.15650041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0198 >>0200 >>0371

Massive U-Turn: Austria to Repeal Almost All ‘Corona Apartheid’ Rules Targeting Unvaxxed

Peter Caddle17 Feb 2022

 

In what amounts to a seismic u-turn in policy, Austria is to relax all ‘Corona Apartheid’ rules targetting the nation’s unvaccinated, despite having previously promised to keep unjabbed individuals under perpetual lockdown.

 

Austria’s coalition government has announced that the vast majority of lockdown measures in place in the country — including the almost all “Corona Apartheid” restrictions specifically targeting the nation’s unvaccinated — are to be scrapped from March 5.

 

This is despite authorities having previously promised that unjabbed individuals would remain under harsh restrictions in perpetuity, with the nation’s then-Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg telling Austrians that the unjabbed would not be able to participate in society until they were inoculated against the Chinese Coronavirus.

 

However, according to a report by Kronen Zeitung, this threat has not aged well, with the government announcing a roadmap for the relaxation of COVID measures which will see the nation’s unvaccinated once again allowed into bars and restaurants as soon as this Saturday.

 

From Feb 19th, regulations banning the unjabbed from bars and restaurants are to be relaxed, with individuals who have neither been vaccinated, nor have recovered from COVID-19, once again to be allowed present a negative test for the disease in order to enter such establishments.

 

What’s more, Austria’s unjabbed will not even have to put up with this inconvenient measure for long, with the use of vaccine passes in the country set to be all but abolished on March 5.

 

The almost complete removal of vaccine passes from Austrian life will coincide with the abolition of the vast majority of Austria’s other COVID lockdown rules, such as a curfew on the nation’s hospitality sector.

 

Some rules will nevertheless remain in place, however, including the mandatory use of high-class FFP2 masks on public transport and in supermarkets.

 

The use of COVID certs will also be maintained with hospitals and nursing homes within the country, while entering Austria from abroad will also reportedly require either proof of vaccination, recovery, or a negative COVID test.

 

While Austria had already returned limited freedoms to the nation’s unvaccinated earlier in the year, this announcement marks a significant u-turn on the nation’s approach to dealing with unvaccinated individuals.

 

However, despite these relaxations, authorities still seem to remain adamant about its continued regime of forced vaccination.

 

Vaccination against the Chinese Coronavirus has been mandatory for all over-18s within the country since February 5, though the use of penalties — including fines of up to €3,600 — has yet to come into effect.

 

While authorities in the country have emphasised that the forced vax rules are not “a short-term measure, but a medium-term perspective” that is required to tackle COVID, Karl Nehammer — who serves as the nation’s current chancellor — has emphasised that a commission of experts is to be set up to continuously analyse the constitutionality and necessity of compulsory vaccination within Austria.

 

The Chancellor claims that an initial assessment of the rules is expected on March 15, shortly before penalties for the unjabbed are expected to come into force.

 

This reassurance that the rules are to be constantly reexamined comes hot on the heels of a report by Kronen Zeitung which claimed that the forced vax rules currently in place have not had a positive effect on vaccine uptake in the nation’s capital of Vienna.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/02/17/massive-u-turn-austria-to-repeal-almost-all-corona-apartheid-rules-targeting-unvaxxed/

Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 8:46 a.m. No.15650076   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Space Force Is Still Finding Its Way. Space Force Offers Clues

Ramin SkibbaFeb 17, 2022 7:00 AM

As the Netflix series starts its second season, both the fictional and the real military service are struggling with identity crises.

 

One year ago, it was unclear whether the beleaguered US Space Force would survive. It was former president Trump’s initiative, and a widely ridiculed one at that, and some wondered if President Biden would can it. He didn't. Now, the US military’s sixth branch is struggling to find legitimacy and purpose in a world that still snickers at its Star Trek-ian logo and goofy name.

 

Netflix’s Space Force flies on a similar trajectory. Launched in 2020 as a send-up of Trump’s agency, the series, which returns Friday for a second season, faces an identity crisis not unlike that of its namesake—albeit one with less brinkmanship and more comedy. It’s searching for a prime directive, a mission, now that the branch it satirizes is no longer a viral meme. Yet even if jokes about a constantly tweeting president no longer land, Space Force still shows where the Space Force could go.

 

(This is your obligatory spoiler warning. If you don’t mind minor plot details, full speed ahead.)

 

This, perhaps, most comes through when Space Force highlights the risks and consequences of arms races in space, especially between the US, China, and Russia. The show’s first season, for example, involved a Chinese spacecraft clipping the solar panels off of a US satellite, maiming its only power source. In response, General Mark Naird (show cocreator Steve Carell) unsuccessfully deployed a chimp (or “chimpstronaut”) to space to save them, and later the clash nearly led to a conflict between Chinese and American astronauts on the moon. By the end of the second season, hackers, apparently Russian, have temporarily disabled a satellite called Blue Öyster Cult, which began descending in the atmosphere and feared the reaper.

 

The real Space Force, led since its inception in December 2019 by General John “Jay” Raymond, thankfully hasn’t witnessed such attacks, but the escalating competition and growing threats are there. The three big space powers have all tested anti-satellite missiles and conducted research and development on high-energy lasers that could be fired at satellites. Relations between the countries could easily worsen, and Raymond would be wise not to follow, well, any of Naird’s examples.

 

The US Space Force's goal isn't to start a space conflict, but rather to have the muscle necessary to respond to one. That’s all well and good, but it’s dangerous when all sides see it that way, since deterrence and defense can look like offense to one’s rivals. If anything, the Space Force—the real one—would do well to have its own Dr. Adrian Mallory (John Malkovich), someone who often (though not always) serves as the conscience of the agency on Space Force, someone who looks to science first, military retaliation last, and considers ethics when others don’t.

 

Netflix’s series also offers some bitter pills of space diplomacy. In the new season’s third episode, Naird hosts a tense meal with the agency's Chinese counterparts. The scene is one of many that weaves a bureaucratic storyline with an interpersonal one, giving the Chinese delegation more nuance than they had in the first season, where the members largely came off as cartoonish villains. “It wasn't about politics, it wasn’t about the deal, it was about what we can relate to: the human experience and family and friends,” says Jimmy O. Yang, who plays scientist Dr. Chan Kaifang and also served as a writer on season two. “And that’s how you make headway in humanizing the opposite side.”

 

In the show and in the real world, the Space Force sometimes collaborates with the Air Force and NASA on research, training, and technology development, but it often seems caught between their completely different missions. That’s especially the case on Space Force, where “guardians” participate in moon and Mars missions, and are also tasked with preventing alien contamination of spacecraft and tracking near-Earth asteroids, efforts traditionally within NASA’s ambit.

 

So how can the Space Force realize its mission, to keep space safe and accessible while also protecting US national interests? The challenges will only grow as traffic in orbit increases, spacecraft become more advanced and can be more easily targeted, and as agencies and companies rush to once again have “boots on the moon.” A small step for humankind would be to have rules in space, or at least norms of behavior, to discourage weapons tests and cyberattacks and reduce the chance of a deadly misunderstanding. After being on the fence for years, the US military, including the Space Force, now supports developing such norms. To quote Dr. Mallory, “Space should be a zone of wonder, not of conflict and death.”

 

https://www.wired.com/story/space-force-vs-space-force/

Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 9 a.m. No.15650170   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trudeau Doesn't Want To End The Protests Peacefully. He Wants Violence

They are not even a national emergency according to the Emergencies Act’s own definition: an “urgent and critical situation” that “seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it.”

No reasonable person thinks that’s what the protests in Ottawa are. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has said the federal government has not met the threshold necessary to invoke the Emergencies Act, and that invoking it “threatens our democracy and our civil liberties.” According to some recent polls, a not insignificant number of Canadians agree.

Yet Trudeau is bringing down the full force of the federal government to quash the Freedom Convoy. Under the Emergencies Act, protesters can have their bank accounts frozen, and so can people who simply donate to protesters. Crowdfunding platforms and payment service providers must cease all services to anyone they suspect might be participating in “illegal blockades,” and report it to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Truckers can have their commercial and private drivers’ licenses revoked, and can lose their insurance and their vehicles.

Even more ominously, Canadiangovernment officials are now warning parents who bring their children to “illegal assemblies,” or even provide food or fuel to protesters, that they could not only face jail time and steep fines, they could lose custody of their children.On Wednesday, the Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa put out a statement urging parents at the demonstrations to make alternate care arrangements, “should they become unable to care for their children following potential police action.”

The threat here is obvious: if you protest, we’ll arrest you and take your children away. Trudeau (Clinton’s advice) has effectively weaponized Canada’s version of child protective services to suppress legitimate political dissent. What do you think is going to happen when the police start trying to remove children from their parents? If it were your child, what would you do?

But that would create a disturbing spectacle at the least, and at worst provoke a confrontation that could turn violent.

 

If that happens, Trudeau will bear the blame. He has set up a situation where violence, or at least some kind of forcible crackdown by Canadian law enforcement against protesters, is becoming inevitable.

 

At no point, even after drawing widespread criticism for his mishandling of the situation, has Trudeau shown any sign of compromise, or done anything to give the protesters an off-ramp. As Eric Kaufman noted this week in the Telegraph, Trudeau’s hypocrisy in these matters is blatant:

 

Contrast his combative posture towards the truckers with his gentle approach to protesters who would seem to share his philosophy. When Left-wing arsonists burned some 30 Catholic churches over a false claim that mass graves had been discovered near a former residential school for indigenous Canadians, Trudeau called the violence ‘understandable’. When indigenous protesters and their allies blocked rail lines and pipelines over a longer period than the trucker convoy, Trudeau patiently called for ‘dialogue and mutual respect’.

 

At this point, if you’re a protester in Canada, or someone who supports the protests, or even someone who thinks the protesters are wrong but the government has gone too far, the message from Trudeau is clear: We will not listen to you, we will not compromise with you, and if you don’t comply with our orders, we will ruin you.

 

That is a recipe for violence, and Trudeau knows it. He wants to make an example out of these truckers because deep down he is an illiberal man with an intolerant worldview….

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/02/17/trudeau-does-not-want-to-end-the-protests-peacefully-he-wants-violence/

Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 9:07 a.m. No.15650214   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0267

Ex-Georgia official wore fake pregnancy stomach in paid leave scheme

Mark Lungariello

Yikes look at that face! Welcome to Georgia where the grift never ends!

 

A former Georgia official faked being pregnant so she could take paid maternity leave — but her scheme came apart when a co-worker noticed her baby bump was bogus, officials said.

 

Robin Folsom, 43, also allegedly made up a fake baby daddy to send an email to her bosses that said she was under doctor’s orders for several weeks of bed rest after giving birth in May 2021, the Georgia Office of the Inspector General announced this week.

 

The birth-that-wasn’t came two months after a co-worker at the state’s Vocational Rehabilitation Agency allegedly saw part of Folsom’s fake pregnancy stomach “come away” from her body, according to a news release from the IG’s office.

 

Folsom, director of external affairs for the agency, sent her co-workers photos of her supposed newborn, but they “depicted children with varying skin tones,” the release stated.

 

The father of her child, Bran Otmembebwe, was a made-up person, but Folsom, when pressed by investigators in October 2021, doubled down and said he really existed, the indictment against her says.

 

Folsom had informed the agency that she gave birth once before, in July 2020, and got pregnant again in August 2021. But the IG found there were no official records of Folsom having given birth and her insurance records didn’t indicate any pregnancy or delivery. She resigned from her state gig last October after investigators interviewed her as part of the probe into her fake pregnancies, the release said.

 

“All state employees, and especially those that communicate with the media and general public on behalf on their agency, should be held to the highest standards of integrity and honesty,” IG Scott McAfee said in a statement. “OIG will continue to hold state employees accountable if they choose to deceive their superiors and receive undeserved compensation.”

 

Folsom was charged with three counts of making false statements and one count of identity fraud after a local grand jury indicted her, state Attorney General Chris Carr announced this week.

 

“Fraud by state employees will not be tolerated,” Carr said in a statement. “By working with Georgia’s independent inspector general, we were able to discover, investigate and put an end to this alleged deception. We will always stand up to protect taxpayer dollars, and we look forward to presenting our case in court.”

 

https://nypost.com/2022/02/16/ex-georgia-official-robin-folsom-wore-fake-pregnancy-stomach-in-paid-leave-scheme/

Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 9:13 a.m. No.15650249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0260 >>0266

>>15650177

Gawd this asshole is so screwed in so many ways. Think Pompeo running CIA after him. Think Grenell and Ratcliffe at DNI talking to all whistleblowers and all the documents left behind.

 

I can hardly wait for this pompous ass criminal, to receive Gods Judgement

Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 9:31 a.m. No.15650346   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0371

Trudeau condemned around the world for moving to crush protests

February 16, 2022

 

Kek even NWO leaders are condemning the jackass

Figures from around the world are standing with Canadian protestors who oppose COVID-19 mandates after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act to quash peaceful demonstrations.

 

International journalists, authors, politicians, broadcasters and celebrities have savaged Trudeau over the authoritarian move.

 

The criticisms come from varied countries including the US, UK, France, Brazil and the Netherlands. Their common theme is a distaste for Trudeau’s excessive powers and his attempt to strip Canadians of their right to peaceful assembly.

 

True North has made a list of some of the most prominent global voices speaking out against the Liberal government’s ongoing tyranny.

 

UK MP Marcus Fysh accuses Canadian government of “authoritarian measures”

 

UK Conservative MP Marcus Fysh wrote to his own Foreign Secretary to ask what the United Kingdom was doing to discourage the Canadian government from using “arbitrary (and) authoritarian measures against” Canadian citizens.

 

US Senator Marsha Blackburn accuses Trudeau of “abusing his power”

 

Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn accused the prime minister of “abusing his power to target political opponents” by invoking the Emergencies Act.

 

Protestors gather outside of Canadian embassy in New York

 

Videos posted on social media showed a group of protestors gathered outside the Consulate General of Canada in New York City to show their support for Canadians opposed to COVID-19 mandates. Protestors waved Canadian and American flags.

 

Investor and author Robert Kiyosaki says he stands with “freedom fighters”

 

Investor and author of Rich Dad Poor Dad Robert Kiyosaki compared the Liberal government to“fascist tyrants” and likened protestors who were demonstrating against COVID-19 measures to “freedom fighters” in a tweet on Tuesday.

 

Author Douglas Murray says all UK parties should unite to condemn Trudeau

 

Author and speaker Douglas Murray tweeted on Tuesday that all UK parties should unite in concern over the drastic actions Trudeau has taken against peaceful protestors.

 

French journalist Francois Ruffin says Trudeau’s liberalism “is authoritarian”

 

In a tweet on Tuesday, French journalist Francois Ruffin compared Trudeau to French president Emmanuel Macron who has also taken drastic actions against COVID-19 mandate protestors..

 

“In Canada, Justin Trudeau, Macron’s twin, establishes the state of exception. No coincidence in these parallel stories: their Project stumbles on democracy? They pass it by force. From now on, liberalism is authoritarian,” tweeted Ruffin in French.

 

Brazilian politician and former attorney general accuses Trudeau of dictatorship

 

Brazilian Member of the Chamber of Deputies and former federal district attorney general Bia Kicis wrote in Portuguese on Twitter that Trudeau had turned Canada into a dictatorship.

 

“Canada is no longer a free country, it has become a dictatorship under the command of the “progressive” Trudeau. To contain peaceful protesters against the health passport, the tyrant withdraws civil rights, being able to order the freezing of bank accounts, fines and even imprisonment,” the translated tweet read.

 

Dutch singer Tim Douwsma blasts “horrible Trudeau”

 

On Tuesday Dutch singer and celebrity Tim Dowsma asked when the Netherlands will “speak out about this horrible Trudeau and what he is doing to his own citizens” in a tweet which has been translated into English.

 

https://tnc.news/2022/02/16/trudeau-condemned-around-the-world-for-moving-to-crush-protests/

Anonymous ID: 6fbc49 Feb. 17, 2022, 9:36 a.m. No.15650393   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15650343

I’ve checked multiple conservative journalists their handles show but no posts

 

I’ve checked Poso’s and other movers and shakers their sites dont come up

 

Any conservative news not coming up,

 

Bradford files comes up but no news

 

They are blovking all the news, there are too mamy people finding out about HRC coup, Canada illegal crackdown, banks closing accounts and determined who insurrectionist

 

Too much was waking up the world