Anonymous ID: d01c73 Feb. 17, 2022, 8:26 p.m. No.15655197   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5242

From Sorcha, so, sure some will disapprove. No offense taken.

I read it however sometimes for a different perspective, and occasionally find some gems.

Today they suggest that GiveSendGo was hacked by joint CIA-CSIS operation out of Kiev.

It's an interesting theory to ponder.

 

a joint covert operation occurring in Ukraine carried out by the American intelligence organization CIA and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)—a covert operation that saw CIA-CSIS computer experts hacking into the Christian fundraising site GiveSendGo, that’s so far raised over $9.5-million to support Covid mandate protesting Canadian truckers—after GiveSendGo was hacked the American leftist media began a terror threat campaign against those who donated to aid Canadian truckers—in Canada all of its citizens who donated to these truckers have now had their bank accounts frozen for confiscation—when the SVR discovered this crime the CIA then smashed all of the computers it was using at the American Embassy in Kiev—then it saw the CIA evacuating its station in Kiev, and its top station chief fleeing to the Ukraine-Polish border, where he was whisked away by a US military helicopter—and saw this covert operation being led by Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland

 

https://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3835.htm

 

Regarding the bank BS in Canada I have one problem that to me seems glaring:

 

How can banks move forward blocking bank accounts of people who they only know about from a data breach performed by a guy who doesn't look reliable? He seems like a speed tweaker.

How do they know it is real data? How can they verify it?

 

I wonder if the case can be argued that the only way banks can legally use this as actionable data if the data was in fact obtained via a state sanctioned action? Now THAT would be interesting.

 

Maybe GiveSendGo should come out with a press release saying that yes they were hacked, but the hackers only got their decoy info that they keep on hand for such an occasion. They analyzed the data that was released and it is not legitimate.

Anonymous ID: d01c73 Feb. 17, 2022, 8:36 p.m. No.15655263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15655132

I think maybe it's Roberts.

Couldn't ignore that.

Would draw attention to all the illegal FISA

Let Hilderbeast stew in her own filth for as long as possible.