catch up qtime network. anon gave you that on Monday.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/bill-hillary-clinton-giustra-corporate-canada/article32675340/
The Clinton connection
How Bill and Hillary raised and earned millions from Canada's corporate elite
grammerly wrote it.
dont think they dont have emergency staffing backfill plans.
Remember how Aussie law allows forforeign 'police'? Does CAN have similar?
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020B00123/BuyPrintCopy
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2021a/21bd015
Schedule 2—Immunities proposes amendments to:
provideAustralian Defence Force (ADF) members and other Defence personnel with immunity from civil and criminal liability in certain cases while performing duties to support civil emergency and disaster preparedness, recovery and response
permit the CDF or the Secretary to extend that immunity to other persons,including members of foreign military forces and foreign police forcesand
Civil Assistance Plan between US & Canada, circa 2008, that allows for the request for foreign police/military assistance during an "emergency."
The first agreement was in 2008, however we didn't get a publicly available version of the entire document & all related appendices until it was updated in 2012, full PDF available here.
publicintelligence dot net/canus-cap-12/
(1) This bilateral plan provides a framework for military forces of one nation to support military forces of the other nation that are providing military support of civil authorities.
(2) The focus of this document is the unique, bilateral military planning considerations required to align our respective national military plans to respond quickly to national requests for military support of civil authorities. Nothing in this plan prevents either nation from responding unilaterally; rather, this plan will facilitate unity of effort, if and when requests for bilateral support are received.
The purpose of the Canada-United States Civil Assistance Plan (CAP) is to provide a framework for the military of one nation to provide support to the military of the other nation while in the performance of civil support operations to the primary agency (e.g., floods, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, and effects of a terrorist attack).
(1) Should resources be identified outside the capabilities of each nations’ military, requests for civilian agency support would require Government of Canada (GoC) or U.S. Government (USG) approval. Support covered under this plan will only be provided when agreed to by appropriate authorities in both the GoC and the USG. When approved, military forces from one nation augment the other nation’s forces in civil support operations.
(2) Military support under this plan is not provided directly to law enforcement agencies, but rather to the other nation’s military. Support to law enforcement operations will only be considered as part of military-to-military support to civil support operations; typically, restricted to logistical and other means of indirect assistance unless coordinated and approved by both nations’ governments prior to mission execution. One nation’s military will never be directly in support of the other nation’s law enforcement agencies. GoC and USG approval will clearly delineate command relationships to ensure any military support to a nation’s law enforcement operations is under the control of that nation’s military commander.
No mention as to how law enforcement support to law enforcement is coordinated, just that military support to law enforcement will be through the other nations military directly.
(3) Guidance and direction to develop this plan is derived from Ref 1f. This bilateral plan may be used alone, or concurrent with the Canada-U.S. Combined Defense Plan or other national, bi-national or bi-lateral plans. The Commander, Canada COM and CDRUSNORTHCOM are the designated planning agents for the development of this plan.
CANADA
(a) The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT). DFAIT is responsible on behalf of the GoC for facilitating requests for international assistance.
(b) Public Safety Canada (PS). The Minister of Public Safety is assigned primary responsibility within the GoC to coordinate the federal response in crisis and consequence management situations within Canada.
(c) Department of National Defence (DND) / Canadian Forces (CF). The CF may, upon request, provide support to PS, other federal departments and agencies, provincial/territorial and municipal authorities pursuant to the National Defence Act (NDA), or other legal authority. Commander, Canada COM is the responsible CF operational commander within the Canada COM AOR defined as Canada, the contiguous United States, Alaska, Mexico, and the maritime approaches to North America.
(2) UNITED STATES
(a) Department of State (DOS). The Department of State is responsible for coordinating with other nations for disaster assistance, including military assistance. (Ref 3l).
pt1
(b) Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Secretary of DHS is the principal federal official (PFO) responsible for U.S. domestic incident management. As a component of DHS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is responsible for leading and supporting a risk-based, comprehensive emergency management system of preparedness, protection, response, recovery and mitigation to reduce the loss of life and property and protect the U.S. from all hazards.
(c) Department of Defense (DOD). In accordance with the National Response Framework (Ref 3k) DOD may, upon request, provide support to DHS and other federal agencies for domestic Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA). Upon SecDef approval, CDRUSNORTHCOM is the supported combatant commander with responsibility to coordinate defense support to federal agencies within the portion of the United States that lies within CDRUSNORTHCOM’s AOR.
~
Law enforcement and regulatory functions.
(1) United States.
(a) USNORTHCOM forces are generally prohibited from directly participating in the enforcement of U.S. law. Exceptions to this general rule and categories of permissible support to law enforcement are outlined in the references at paragraph 1.k(1) of this Appendix. The NORTHCOM SJA shall advise on any contemplated USNORTHCOM support to U.S. law enforcement.
(b) The PCA does not prohibit USNORTHCOM forces from directly participating in the enforcement of U.S. law outside of U.S. territory; however, DOD policy prohibits such activities unless authorized by SecDef (see DoDD 5525.5). The PCA does not prohibit USNORTHCOM forces from supporting Canada Command in the enforcement of Canadian law; however, such operations must be authorized by the SecDef and CDS and must be consistent with Canadian law. The NORTHCOM SJA shall advise on any contemplated USNORTHCOM support to U.S. law enforcement. (See references at paragraph 1.k(1))
pt2
(2) Canada.
(a) The CF has no mandate to conduct civilian law enforcement activities but can assist law enforcement agencies. The CF support can never be greater than the authority of the requesting law enforcement groups to conduct law enforcement activities themselves (see references at paragraph 1.k(2)).
(b) Peace Officer Status for CF. Peace Officers are public authorities responsible to maintain the public peace and enforce the law. CF personnel employed on an operation may have Peace Officer status if it would be appropriate for them to perform law enforcement duties but only when so employed, IAW QR&O 22.01. Peace Officer status ceases when CF personnel are no longer performing assistance to law enforcement duties. CF personnel with Peace Officer status have all the powers and protections of Peace Officers as set out in the Criminal Code and the special protection from civil and criminal liability enjoyed by Peace Officers. CF members without Peace Officer status have no more authority over the civilian population than they would otherwise have when performing their normal day-to-day duties. Specifically, CF personnel without Peace Officers status do not have the enhanced powers of arrest, detention, investigation, or traffic control enjoyed by Peace Officers. A legal advisor should be consulted to know whether CF personnel have peace officer status and when.
I guess we know why Ford issued a state of emergency.
Original press release:
northcom dot mil/Newsroom/News/Article/Article/563556/us-northern-command-canada-command-establish-new-bilateral-civil-assistance-plan/
U.S. Northern Command, Canada Command establish new bilateral Civil Assistance Plan By NORAD and USNORTHCOM Public Affairs
SAN ANTONIO, Texas — U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, and Canadian Air Force Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, have signed a Civil Assistance Plan that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency.
“This document is a unique, bilateral military plan to align our respective national military plans to respond quickly to the other nation's requests for military support of civil authorities,” Renuart said. “Unity of effort during bilateral support for civil support operations such as floods, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes and effects of a terrorist attack, in order to save lives, prevent human suffering and mitigate damage to property, is of the highest importance, and we need to be able to have forces that are flexible and adaptive to support rapid decision-making in a collaborative environment.”
“The signing of this plan is an important symbol of the already strong working relationship between Canada Command and U.S. Northern Command,” Dumais said. “Our commands were created by our respective governments to respond to the defense and security challenges of the twenty-first century, and we both realize that these and other challenges are best met through cooperation between friends.”
pt3
The plan recognizes the role of each nation's lead federal agency for emergency preparedness, which in the United States is the Department of Homeland Security and in Canada is Public Safety Canada. The plan facilitates the military-to-military support of civil authorities once government authorities have agreed on an appropriate response.
U.S. Northern Command was established on Oct. 1, 2002, to anticipate and conduct homeland defense and civil support operations within the assigned area of responsibility to defend, protect, and secure the United States and its interests.
Similarly, Canada Command was established on Feb. 1, 2006, to focus on domestic operations and to offer a single point of contact for all domestic and continental defense and security partners.
The two domestic commands established strong bilateral ties well before the signing of the Civil Assistance Plan. The two commanders and their staffs meet regularly, collaborate on contingency planning and participate in related annual exercises.
4 of 4
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/srdvdn/weve_heard_allegations_of_detroit_police/
New Bill to Allow Foreign Forces and Troops to be Used on Australian Soil
https://realnewsaustralia.com/2020/10/18/new-bill-to-allow-foreign-forces-and-troops-to-be-used-on-australian-soil/
UN Agenda 21/30’s vision is coming to fruition. Setting up nations in the UN to allow armies from other nations to be used on their soil against their own people with impunity.
By General Maddox.
Just when we thought the Omnibus Bill (which passed following some amendments) was an overreach of authoritarian power, the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020 has been put forward.
This law will allow foreign troops and foreign police forces to be used on Australian soil against the Australian people in times of a declared “emergency”. Most likely under the banner of NATO or the United Nations.
These foreign forces and/or police will be able to act with impunity, immune from all prosecution for any laws they break, damage to persons and private property caused whilst on Australian soil.
If passed the new law will allow foreign troops to be called upon in an emergency. But what constitutes an emergency? Industrial action? Anti-government protests? Civil unrest? Another fake Pandemic? The definition is so broad that it basically can mean anything that they want it to mean.
However that’s not even the point. Military. Especially foreign military should never ever be used against civilians. Make no mistake their primary role is to kill the enemy at the behest of government in order to protect Australia and her interests. It is not to police civilians at home.
Should this bill pass that means at any point in time if an emergency is declared foreign military or foreign police can legally be used to suppress the Australian people. Let that sink in. Also let it sink in that we are currently under a state of disaster in Victoria and a state of emergency across all of Australia.
One must ask the question, why? When this so-called “pandemic” is almost in the rear view mirror. Why go for this massive power grab now? And who’s behind this?
This new law is an absolute abomination and when you combine it with the recently passed COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) and Other Acts Amendments Bill 2020 you really start to get a very clear picture of where Australia is heading politically. History is repeating and the masses are oblivious.
“Because of their large size and scope, omnibus bills limit opportunities for debate and scrutiny. Historically, omnibus bills have sometimes been used to pass controversial amendments. For this reason, some consider omnibus bills to be anti-democratic.” – Wikipedia
The Victorian government’s COVID-19 Omnibus Emergency Measures and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2020 was rushed through the state’s legislative assembly. The Bill was tabled by State Attorney General Jill Hennessy.
The Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020 was tabled by none other than the Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews.
These two people represent a clear and present danger to the people of Victoria.
The #CoronaHoax has been exposed. No one is dying from a virus that has never been isolated. It’s not a threat to humanity let alone the people of Victoria. Look anywhere else in Australia… COVID-19 as a…thing, a way of life is pretty much gone. Only a few ridiculous measures are still in place and hopefully soon to be gone too. Yet Victoria is going ahead, guns blazing, and carrying on the COVID-19 narrative. Why?
Could it be that Melbourne, in fact, all of Victoria, is a part of the “Strong Cities Network”? A UN/Globalist Soros backed initiative. Also tie in that Victoria (the only state in all of Australia) is signed on to China’s Belt and Road Initiative and all of these draconian laws we mentioned earlier start to make sense.
It’s about setting up a hub within our national borders to kickstart the next step towards the overall goals of complete implementation of the UN Agenda 2030 doctrine.
We and many others have been discussing and writing about these plans for our future by the globalist cabal for years. We have mentioned the extension of vaccine related laws since the No Jab – No Play laws first came in. No jab – No Travel is one of those extensions. Even Bill Gates talks about making sure we have vaccine and immunity passports to travel. Well now Victoria has taken the lead on this directive too.
That’s right folks it’s now a reality. We have taken yet another step towards a dystopian nightmare.
Clintons like Canada
>is that why our border is so wide open?
195 nation states could stand up publically and condemn trudeau and canadas govt. Not one has. not one.
no international philanthropists have either. no one.
they all are complicit they all must be served
https://twitter.com/CTVNews/status/895293528674369536
los traficantes del norte