Anonymous ID: d91123 Feb. 19, 2022, 5:41 p.m. No.15670474   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0599 >>0705 >>0808

Are the thugs in Ottawa and beyond in CAN foreign UN implants?

https://twitter.com/Krommsan/status/1495124318354743299

 

@Krommsan

•2 wks ago, Canadian suppliers were hit with desperate reqfrom #Ottawa for gas masks, MRE’s, gear etc

 

•I see odd uniforms w/tape over patches.

 

•some officers are fumbling with a gas mask like they never put one on & dropping pistols during handling

 

This may explain things…

 

(UN Flights into CAN @ Northbay Ontario Feb. 19, 2022)

Anonymous ID: d91123 Feb. 19, 2022, 5:59 p.m. No.15670623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0705 >>0808

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-06605-w#MOESM1

 

Published: 15 February 2022

Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control

 

Eveline Verleysen, Marina Ledecq, Lisa Siciliani, Karlien Cheyns, Christiane Vleminckx, Marie-Noelle Blaude, Sandra De Vos, Frédéric Brassinne, Frederic Van Steen, Régis Nkenda, Ronny Machiels, Nadia Waegeneers, Joris Van Loco & Jan Mast

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 2529 (2022)

 

Abstract

Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public. STEM-EDX analysis on sections of a variety of single use and reusable face masks visualized agglomerated near-spherical TiO2 particles in non-woven fabrics, polyester, polyamide and bi-component fibers. Median sizes of constituent particles ranged from 89 to 184 nm, implying an important fraction of nano-sized particles (< 100 nm). The total TiO2 mass determined by ICP-OES ranged from 791 to 152,345 µg per mask. The estimated TiO2 mass at the fiber surface ranged from 17 to 4394 µg, and systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg), determined based on a scenario where face masks are worn intensively. No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable. Even so, these results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.

 

_____

Ingested TiO2 has been identified as possibly carcinogenic. Bruno Le Maire, a minister in the Édouard Philippe French government, promised in March 2019 to remove it from alimentary uses and toothpaste.[39][unreliable medical source?] It was banned in France from 2020.[91]

 

In 2021, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) ruled that as a consequence of new understandings of nanoparticles, titanium dioxide could "no longer be considered safe as a food additive", and the EU health commissioner announced plans to ban its use across the EU, with discussions beginning in June 2021. EFSA concluded that genotoxicity—which could lead to carcinogenic effects—could not be ruled out, and that a "safe level for daily intake of the food additive could not be established".[92]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium_dioxide

Anonymous ID: d91123 Feb. 19, 2022, 6:19 p.m. No.15670789   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15670678

which Q posts do the reference in the article, and what links to them are provided? If not, then what data did their forensic analysis use?

 

has any MSM source EVER provide a direct link to Q posts?