>>1567161

I sorry, but I'm still just seeing a bunch of semi-arbitrary assumptions to create The Clock.

Any system for mapping date portion of the timestamp of one post to the minute portion of the timestamp of another post will have a 1-in-60 chance of matching just by random chance. and there are over 1400 posts. There will be a lot of "connected" posts regardless of how you set the starting offsets. And with the recurring themes that Q uses, you are bound to find connections in the contents of the messages.

Everything that clockanon has been pointing at could easily happen by random chance. And what extra information would Q communicate by doing this? It's useful to coordinate his posts with the president's confirm legitimacy. But just posting in internally consistent patterns, if such patterns are confirmed to exist, tells us nothing.

Before we all declare Wikileaks comped and black hat and start attacking them, ask yourself what exactly the credibility of Q loses by WL saying this. People who already believe Q is a LARP will tend to people who don't give WL and JA much credibility. So they wont care what WL thinks. And people who do believe in Q will come out defending him/them by reiterating for the normies in Twitter the proofs of Q's legitimacy that he has made via correlations with Trumps tweets.

You are probably already thinking about how attacks will only increase the viability of this board, as Q has said. But have you considered that this isn't backfiring, but WL's deliberate intent?

WL/JA is sneaky like that…