dChan
Anonymous ID: 910585 Feb. 20, 2022, 4:25 p.m. No.15678005   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8042 >>8286 >>8438 >>8681 >>8727

>>15677933

>>15677618 (pb)

>Who Is Behind QAnon? Linguistic Detectives Find Fingerprints

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Who+Is+Behind+QAnon%3F+Linguistic+Detectives+Find+Fingerprints

 

not much on qresear.ch

 

but found via twitter

 

https://twitter.com/vranzvischer/status/1495083851869302787?s=20&t=Rng5yXb5EqXpTlCZgiKgVA

 

What do digital medieval philologists do? They ask the right questions and find the answers too!

Excellent research by

@Jbcamps

, visiting professor

@venicedph

, & team on who is behind QAnon. Read the full

@nytimes

report: https://nytimes.com/2022/02/19/technology/qanon-messages-authors.html?smid=tw-share

@CaFoscari

 

@digitalmedieval

 

https://twitter.com/Jbcamps/status/1495060058782195712?s=20&t=Rng5yXb5EqXpTlCZgiKgVA

Anonymous ID: 910585 Feb. 20, 2022, 5:43 p.m. No.15678641   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15678286

>BIGGEST SHORTCOMING:

>they pre-selected the group to analyze and then said "Ron W is the one most like Q."

 

>>15678310

>Analysts of Q posts compared a preselected small sample and decided Ron was most likely to be Q

 

>This kind of study is EXTREMELY limited in scope. Not the basis for concluding "Ron Watkins is Q."

>>15678322

>The purpose is not to conclude anything, merely to throw shade on CodeMonkey. The libtards will take it as definitive proof

>>15678479

>You are right.

 

>But the first step (for me, at least) is to get the goods on what they did and look for holes. There are plenty here.

 

>The next is to figure out how to turn their attack against them - get your own experts and how how flawed it is.

 

>Not likely to "win" - but only have to cast doubt to put a monkey wrench in their strategy.

>>15678516

>Find ways to show their computer models are no better than the initial models used for hurricanes (the colored spaghetti of possible tracks in all directions)

 

>Look into these proclaimed "experts" and who and what organizations are connected to them

 

>Find the funding source, Open Society Foundation or DNC directly exposes the whole thing as politically motivated hit piece

 

Here is the preprint