>>15677961 pb
>>15677875 pb
I was wrong about the article being editing - found it on Wayback. But there is another article View wrote….cannot locate.
But here is the description of the talk
View gave in 2018 at Atlantic Council's Stratcom conference, no longer available online. View is the one on the far right (ha ha).
>@digitalmedieval
Examined their analysis.
BIGGEST SHORTCOMING:
==they pre-selected the group to analyze
and then said "Ron W is the one most like Q."==
I would expect this to be true. Look at Q and look at Ron - both highly analytical. Unusually so. When done as a comparison with less analytical individuals, Ron will "win."
preprint_Cafiero-Camps_20220219.pdf
ALSO:
The authors only cited TWO articles not published by 'experts' in their field - both HIT PIECES by MSM, including the infamous Jana Winter article that is absolutely DISPROVEN - dug on it in early September 2020.
Jana Winter. 2019. FBI document warns conspiracy theories are a new domestic terrorism threat. Yahoo News 1 (2019). https://news.yahoo.com/fbi- documents-conspiracy-theories-terrorism-160000507.html
Brandy Zadrozny and Ben Collins. 2018. Iwho is behind the Qanon conspiracy? We’ve traced it to three people. NBC News (Aug. 2018). https: //www.nbcncws.com/tcch/tcch-news/how- three-conspiracy-theorists- took-q-sparkcd-qanon-n900531
Analysts of Q posts compared a preselected small sample and decided Ron was most likely to be Q
This kind of study is EXTREMELY limited in scope. Not the basis for concluding "Ron Watkins is Q."
HUGE TY ANON.
great work.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15677933.html#q15678005
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15677933.html#15678286
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15677933.html#15678310
You are right.
But the first step (for me, at least) is to get the goods on what they did and look for holes. There are plenty here.
The next is to figure out how to turn their attack against them - get your own experts and how how flawed it is.
Not likely to "win" - but only have to cast doubt to put a monkey wrench in their strategy.
*show how flawed
well-said.
*if you are here