Anonymous ID: 441665 Feb. 21, 2022, 1:44 a.m. No.15681046   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1049 >>1057

>>15680927

>"in right hand or forehead"

>does not get more specific than that

only a total TARD would put any stock in that line of reasoning. first, the scriptures were written for an audience of illiterate peasants one step past the stone age. second, it was written in long dead languages that didn't even use the same alphabet. it has been transcribed, transliterated, translated, deliberately edited, uncounted times, by fallible men and men with agendas. to believe that those english words are "specific" is the height of hubris and stupidity. the scriptures MUST be read figuratively, idiomatically, allegorically, and with a huge grain of salt. Jesus taught by using parables, not literal facts.

 

from that perspective, to what would "hand" or "forehead" refer? well, in biblical times, how is a man identified? by his face, of course, and by the print of his hand (a practice that predates fingerprints by millennia). so the metaphorical interpretation of that scripture passage would be that the mark of the beast will be written on the features that uniquely identify a man. today, we know that as DNA.

and that is EXACTLY where the clotshot writes itself, into your DNA.

 

even if the authors of scripture somehow magically knew what DNA was (which is impossible), how could they have possibly explained that to the audience of their time? no. it's CRYSTAL CLEAR, in hindsight, that what scripture is referring to IS the clotshot, which is a mark on the most basic feature of a man that identifies him as a unique individual, his DNA.

 

God gave you a brain so you would USE it. to reject the fruits of reason in favor of MINDLESS obsession with ancient dogma, is NOT an act of faith, it is a DENIAL of faith, faith in your God-given capacity to THINK.