>>15690140

Mostly agreed.

Here’s THE quandary: How can it be absolutely determined that the person doing that to a child, be it masking, injections, or even sexual predation… is doing it by FALSELY claiming Law on their side… or doing it because they FALSELY believe the Law is valid? Either way, that person is in the wrong (you have no argument from me on that), however, if it could be clearly demonstrated that the person was twisting the Law to their wish, vs. a person too gullible and stupid to challenge the wrongness of Law (not many people are capable of actually doing that)…

The difference would be similar to arresting the ignorant (and THEN contesting them in corrupt courts, ugh)… vs. being righteous in the eyes of the entire Universe summarily executing on the spot the more egregious offender predating upon children AND hiding behind “Law”?

Honest Injun question.

For example, the “teachers” posing with the children in the school picture, most likely BELIEVE they are “doing the right thing”, even though the children are being psychologically destroyed. Such “teachers” most assuredly need to be stopped and removed from being anywhere near children again.

But if it could be proven beyond a shadow of doubt, that the “teacher” was KNOWING attempting to destroy the minds of those children… i would volunteer to end their terrestrial ride immediately. Wat do?

>>15690247

Then you and i are back to debating ‘the law’. Which law? Who’s law? What law?

Most of the people floating atop the shitheap of Government are fundamentally ignorant of Law vs. law… yet march along happily confident that the Law is on their side while burning down everything around them. They need to be stopped. No argument from me.

Yet the ones [theys], KNOWINGLY distorting law to achieve [their] own selfish and oppressive objectives… need to be torn to bloody shreds ASAP!

See the difference, and thus why i’m Asking about how it could be correctly determined?