>>15695247 lb
in terms of higher dimansions, when you watch videos on that you have a lot of that tessaract stuff. imo this does not really explain what dimsnsions are like in the first place. and using a shape that is not even a shape in 3D is not easy to understand.
short explanation:
0D: 1 point, no way to move if you are 0 dimensional
1D: 1 line, you can move in one direction, on that line. your "existence" is like a value of something, you can go up or down. (and do not overinterpret this!)
2D: a plane made of two "lines". you can move into two directions, up/down + left/right
3D: a cuboid, movement in 3 directions, up/down + left/right + forward/backward
now 4th dimension is time, but 4th space dimension is kind of more possibilities of movement. as 3D gives 3 directions to move in and as we live in a 3D space, it´s limited with that.
4D is the possibility of all the 3D movements. (leaving aside higher dimensions and mathematical stuff requiering more dimansions)
so the possibility of all the 3D movements is like looking down on a 3D space, say a little room with a table and two chairs in it.
now not only would you in 4D be able to sort of see through walls, you would see, as your world, as what you perceive, the different poissibilities of arranging the table and the two chairs in that little room.
you would live in it. you would be part of it.
you your "world" would be different arrangements of that room, one with the table in the left corner, one with the table a little away from the left corner or the room, one with table some more away, one with table at left corner and chair next to it, one with table at left corner and chair a little away….all the possibilities, all the possible different arrangements, which are limitless, would be your "world", it would be what you perceive and what you are part of, you would not "move around" in your 3D world, you would move in possibilities.
that is actually what higher dimensions are.
also, just going to shortly mention: masonry using the square, maybe think of it in terms of complex numbers and more in that direction.
>>15695294 lb
thanks, anon, but found it already.
well, I call it universe, but yes, definitly a sense of humor, cannot remember the different things now, but both humor in terms of saying something funny and humor in terms of reacting to something I said and myself considered funny. (this comes to my mind, some comedian said it, obviously not 100% true, but kind of true nevertheless, at least true enought for it to be funny. one things men have humor when they tell jokes, one thinks women have humor when they lough about those joke.)
and I won´t even be pissed of by baker baking this bread. good mood right now.