Anonymous ID: fa3b88 Feb. 24, 2022, 7:26 p.m. No.15715946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5972 >>5974

>>15715805

To be fair, it seems too good to be true, though I'm following to see what happens anyway.

>>15715595 lb

>>15715743 lb

I'm getting the sense Nuney and Kash's buddy is just fucking with us for clicks now kek.

>>15715349 lb

>>15715392 lb

>>15715648 lb

>>15715653 lb

>>15715662 lb

>>15715665 lb

Anons get it. o7

>>15715862

>>15715869

Let's see if the usual shill suspects jump on it…Rothschild, Sommer, etc.

>>15715889

Agree…although, why the "Q Anon is growing" hit pieces? Setup or not?

Anonymous ID: fa3b88 Feb. 24, 2022, 7:52 p.m. No.15716199   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6231 >>6248

>>15715972

Court as many normies as possible while daring tech oligarchs to take Truth offline? Or the whole net? The whole app is a trap to me…but for who/what exactly? It's not like anons gaf, we'll do as we do.

>>15715947

Interdasting. Made that connection the other day myself. "#Truth" started on the 21st, the 3-year delta.

>>15715978

See above, anon. :)

>>15716006

Anons got pissed when Q kept posting Twatter links so…but then again, there's an ingratiating yet very intelligent segment of MAGA Twatter that looks down on anything Q while referring to themselves as "our corner of Twitter" as if the chans weren't doing this shit before them. You can tell they've been convinced of some of the cray shit we discuss here, but they'll never admit it was most likely the chans/Q rubbing off on MAGA Twitter over time. That, and Nunes is now kissing their asses on Truth from some screencaps I've seen. Those are the people that may need confirmation of Q more than anybody at this point. The "too smart for the crazy conspiracy theories" crowd.

Anonymous ID: fa3b88 Feb. 24, 2022, 8:31 p.m. No.15716556   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15715858

Ooh, this is interesting. Big Z a clown puppet after all?

>>15716156

>>15716197

Yes, and I'm sick of it. Though I get the feeling a lot of Russians and Ukrainians are not aware of the true dynamics in their own countries anyway. They're just as brainwashed as anybody here. Can't fight an enemy you don't understand on a battlefield you don't understand.

>>15716231

>guess there are worse things that can be said

True, I still agree with them on most things, Q egos put aside kek. Plus, they got me through when 8ch went down, if I got bored with my own digging kek.

>>15716248

>>15716264

I won't ever know them in real life, but I do still wonder where some of those obtuse perspectives come from and if it means I wouldn't be able to trust their judgment on something else important. Like why did I believe/understand and not them? I'm as cynical as they come, but when my faith is this strong, it's not usually wrong. You can be booksmart yet not streetsmart, I suppose. Or spiritual. "Seeing is believing," like Q basically said. Or it's just a difference of egos. Or like other anon implied, anything less than "I have to save myself" is wrong. They're the ones who see Q as a pacification op to keep you on your ass. Fact is, if a nuke hit somewhere tomorrow, a lot of people would die. No matter how prepared some of them might have been. Running for the school board won't help. Maybe that's the biggest thing some people are equipped to do, and yeah, they should try it, it's important. But the people complaining about Q aren't going to stop the worst things anymore than us trying to spread the info online at this point. Maybe that's all we're equipped to do. At least we try to combat the narrative of WHY things happen. Too many God complexes out there, I think. Fear of retribution, etc. I really can't see enough people getting together to do the heavy lifting that Q has told us they're doing/will do, I just can't. Anons can't even agree on a damn bread banner.