Anonymous ID: e3fcfa Feb. 25, 2022, 6:21 a.m. No.15719091   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9097

>>15719037

Can't jump to conclusions on this. Her "anti-trump rulings" set a precedent for big digs into Obama and Bidan later. I have been quietly optimistic that since Bidan isn't real, this would be a great way for mil/trump to sneak in a nominee that looks anti trump but really isn't. Sleepers aren't just for the bad guys, you know. because dems will automagically assume a black woman must be anti trump, and the dems will look horrible voting against a black woman. Get some popcorn, this part of the movie could be interesting.

Anonymous ID: e3fcfa Feb. 25, 2022, 6:29 a.m. No.15719128   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9220

>>15719092

Had lightning strike maybe 30ft from me. Was on a mountain top when a summer storm whipped up. Scary shit.

 

Was hoping your post was talking about being under a Ukrainian chick. 8964 would be nice too.

Anonymous ID: e3fcfa Feb. 25, 2022, 6:51 a.m. No.15719280   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15719194

Anons are often years ahead of normies in terms of knowing underlying issues. I chalk a lot of normie amateur reporting to this effect. You may still be right, but we won't know that for a while yet.