Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 5:55 p.m. No.15724530   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4599 >>4638 >>4988 >>5053

>https://www.unz.com/pescobar/from-the-black-sea-to-the-east-med-dont-poke-the-russian-bear/

From the Black Sea to the East Med, Don't Poke the Russian Bear

>PEPE ESCOBAR • FEBRUARY 24, 2022 • 1,200 WORDS • 219 COMMENTS

This is what happens when a bunch of ragged hyenas, jackals and tiny rodents poke The Bear: a new geopolitical order is born in breathtaking speed.

 

From a dramatic meeting of the Russian Security Council to a history lesson delivered by President Putin and the subsequent birth of the Baby Twins – the People’s Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk – all the way to their appeal to President Putin to intervene militarily to expel the NATO-backed Ukrainian bombing-and-shelling forces from Donbass, it was a seamless process.

 

The (nuclear) straw that (nearly) broke the Bear’s back – and forced its paws to pounce – was Zelensky the Comedian, back from the Russophobia-drenched Munich Security Conference where he was hailed like a Messiah, saying that the 1994 Budapest memorandum should be revised and Ukraine should be nuclear-rearmed.

 

That would be the equivalent of a nuclear Mexico south of the Hegemon.

 

Putin immediately turned Responsibility to Protect (R2P) upside down: an American concept invented to launch wars in MENA (remember Libya?) was retrofitted to stop a slow-motion genocide in Donbass.

 

First came the recognition of the Baby Twins – Putin’s most important foreign policy decision since going to Syria in 2015. That was the preamble for the next game-changer: a “special military operation (…) aimed at demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine”, as Putin defined it.

 

Up to the last minute, the Kremlin was trying to rely on diplomacy, explaining to Kiev the necessary imperatives to prevent heavy metal thunder: recognition of Crimea as Russian; abandon any plans to join NATO; negotiate directly with the Baby Twins – an anathema for the Americans since 2015; finally, demilitarize and declare Ukraine as neutral.

 

Kiev’s handlers, predictably, would never accept the package – as they didn’t accept the Master Package that really matters: the Russian demand for “indivisible security”.

 

The sequence, then, became inevitable. In a flash, all Ukrainian forces between the so-called line of contact and the original borders of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts were boxed in as the occupying force of territories of two Russian allies that Moscow had just sworn to protect.

 

So it was Get Out – Or Else. “Or else” came as rolling thunder: the Kremlin and the Russian Ministry of Defense were not bluffing. Timed to the end of Putin’s speech announcing the operation, the Russians decapitated with precision missiles everything that mattered in terms of the Ukrainian military in just one hour: Air Force, Navy, airfields, bridges, command and control centers, the whole Turkish Bayraktar drone fleet.

 

And it was not only Russian raw power. It was the artillery of one of the Baby Twins, the DPR, that hit the HQ of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Donbass, which actually housed the entire Ukrainian military command. This means that the Ukrainian General Staff instantly lost control of all its troops.

 

This was Shock and Awe against Iraq, 19 years ago, in reverse: not for conquest, not as a prelude for an invasion and occupation. The political-military leadership in Kiev did not even have time to declare war. They froze. Demoralized troops started deserting. Total defeat – in one hour.

 

The water supply to Crimea was instantly re-established. Humanitarian corridors were set up for the deserters. “Remnants” now include mostly surviving Azov battalion Nazis, mercenaries trained by the usual Blackwater/Academi suspects, and a bunch of Salafi-jihadis.

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 5:58 p.m. No.15724551   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov4uHDqyHzI

President Nixon's Trip to China: Fifty Years Later

>173 views | Feb 25, 2022 | CFR

On the anniversary of President Nixon's February 1972 trip to China, our panelists examine the significance of the trip and its influence on U.S. foreign policy, how U.S.-China relations have fared in the fifty years since the visit, and the challenges ahead for the two countries.

 

The Lessons From History Series uses historical analysis as a critical tool for understanding modern foreign policy challenges by hearing from practitioners who played an important role in a consequential historical event or from experts and historians. This series is made possible through the generous support of David M. Rubenstein.

 

Speakers

 

Winston Lord

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Lord

Chairman Emeritus, International Rescue Committee; Former U.S. Ambassador to China (1985–1989); Former President, Council on Foreign Relations (1977–1985); Former Special Assistant to the National Security Advisor (1970–1973); CFR Member

 

Oriana Skylar Mastro

>https://fsi.stanford.edu/people/oriana-skylar-mastro

Center Fellow, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University; Senior Nonresident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; Member, CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force on a U.S. Response to China's Belt and Road Initiative; CFR Term Member

 

Timothy Naftali

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Naftali

Clinical Associate Professor of History and Public Service, New York University; Coauthor, Impeachment: An American History; Founding Director, Richard Nixon Presidential Library

 

Presider

 

Douglas G. Brinkley

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Brinkley

Katherine Tsanoff Brown Chair in Humanities and Professor of History, Rice University; Coeditor, The Nixon Tapes; CFR Member

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 6:02 p.m. No.15724571   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3842.htm

West Trembles Before Russia As Ukraine Leader Reveals “Everybody Is Afraid”

>February 25, 2022 | Sorcha Faal

An informative new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stating about the goals of the “special operation” authorized by President Putin: “Ideally, Ukraine should be liberated, cleaned from neo-Nazis, from people sharing pro-Nazi sentiment and ideas”, says in a further move against this de-Nazification special operation, which he joined with declaring martial law and cutting diplomatic ties with Russia, it saw Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky declaring a “general mobilization” of his country’s population—in quick response it saw Peskov declaring: “The president formulated his vision of what we would expect from Ukraine in order for the so-called ‘red-line’ problems to be resolved…This is neutral status, and this is a refusal to deploy weapons” and stating: “The achievement of the demilitarization and de-Nazification of Ukraine would eliminate what Russia currently views as a threat to the security of its state and people”—after which Peskov added that President Putin would determine the timing of the negotiations, but gave assurances that Russia would only engage “if the leadership of Ukraine is ready to talk about it”.

 

Speaking in the early hours of the morning from Kiev, this report notes, President Zelensky responded to the Kremlin in a posted video saying he was not afraid to negotiate an end to the Russian special operation and “discuss neutrality”, but would need security guarantees to do so, then revealed he had reached out to his “partners” in the West to tell them that Ukraine’s fate was at stake, and stated about them: “I asked them – are you with us?…They answered that they are with us, but they don’t want to take us into the alliance…I’ve asked 27 leaders of Europe, if Ukraine will be in NATO, I’ve asked them directly – all are afraid and did not respond…We were left by ourselves…Who is ready to go to war for us?…Honestly, I don’t see anybody…Who is ready to give Ukraine guarantees of NATO membership?…Honestly, everybody is afraid”.

 

After repeatedly trying in vain to reach President Putin, this report continues, President Zelensky asked French President Emmanuel Macron to make this call for him—a call with President Putin that President Macron described as “frank, direct, quick” wherein he demanded Russia stop its special de-Nazification operation in Ukraine—after which President Macron announced that the EU had “decided to inflict very severe blows on Moscow” with a range of new sanctions, including on its financial, energy, transport and export sectors, as well as visa bans for particular Russian citizens, and added that Paris would soon deliver an aid package to Kiev worth €1.2 billion ($1.3 billion) and will “continue to deliver military equipment” in support of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

 

With the United States and Ukraine being the only two nations in the world to vote against the United Nations resolution condemning Nazism, this report details, it was no surprise that Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden revealed yesterday that he has “no plans” to talk to President Putin and said there is a “complete rupture” in American-Russian relations—after which it was reported: “A White House spokesman on Thursday lambasted former President Trump and Russian President Vladimir as nauseating, fearful pigs”—then it saw the socialist Biden Regime saying it was prepared to take in Ukrainian refugees, that was joined with the astonishing report: “Despite Southern Border Crisis, CBP Agents Asked To Deploy To Europe For Ukraine Conflict”—astonishing socialist insanity quickly followed by it being reported: “As oil prices continue to rocket, now further helped along by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the Biden administration is still fighting tooth and nail to freeze new oil and gas drilling leases - even after a court ruled against the administration”—and to actually help pay for this special de-Nazification operation in Ukraine, yesterday it saw US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stating: “We’re not halting gas and oil purchases from Russia because we’re trying to minimize pain to us”.

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 6:15 p.m. No.15724644   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4988 >>5053

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denazification

Denazification

Denazification (German: Entnazifizierung) was an Allied initiative to rid German and Austrian society, culture, press, economy, judiciary, and politics of the Nazi ideology following the Second World War. It was carried out by removing those who had been Nazi Party or SS members from positions of power and influence and by disbanding or rendering impotent the organizations associated with Nazism. The program of denazification was launched after the end of the war and was solidified by the Potsdam Agreement in August 1945.

 

The term denazification was first coined as a legal term in 1943 in the Pentagon, intended to be applied in a narrow sense with reference to the post-war German legal system. However, it later took on a broader meaning.[1]

 

In late 1945 and early 1946, the emergence of the Cold War and the economic importance of Germany caused the United States in particular to lose interest in the program, somewhat mirroring the Reverse Course in American-occupied Japan. The British handed over denazification panels to the Germans in January 1946, while the Americans did likewise in March 1946. The French ran the mildest denazification effort. Denazification was carried out in an increasingly lenient and lukewarm way until being officially abolished in 1951. Additionally, the program was hugely unpopular in West Germany, where many Nazis maintained positions of power, and was opposed by the new West German government of Konrad Adenauer.[2] On the other hand, denazification in East Germany was considered a critical element of the transformation into a socialist society and was far stricter in opposing Nazism than its counterpart. However, not all former Nazis faced harsh judgment; doing special tasks for the government could protect a few from prosecution.[3][4]

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 6:20 p.m. No.15724683   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4697 >>4781 >>4988 >>5053

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CeKumgfZ44

KPIX: Cybersecurity Risks Following Russia Invading Ukraine

>391 views | Feb 25, 2022 | KPIX

San Jose State professor Ahmed Banafa lays out the cybersecurity risks following Russia attacking Ukraine.

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 6:22 p.m. No.15724693   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulbright_Program

J. William Fulbright Prize for International Understanding

The J. William Fulbright Prize for International Understanding is awarded by the Fulbright Association to recognize individuals or organisations which have made extraordinary contributions toward bringing peoples, cultures, or nations to greater understanding of others. Established in 1993, the prize was first awarded to Nelson Mandela.

~

Person Year Country

Nelson Mandela 1993 South Africa

Jimmy Carter 1994 United States

Franz Vranitzky 1995 Austria

Corazon Aquino 1996 Philippines

Václav Havel 1997 Czech Republic

Patricio Aylwin 1998 Chile

Mary Robinson 1999 Ireland

Martti Ahtisaari 2000 Finland

Kofi Annan 2001 Ghana

Sadako Ogata 2002 Japan

Fernando Cardoso 2003 Brazil

Colin Powell 2004 United States

Bill Clinton 2006 United States

Desmond Tutu 2008 South Africa

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 2010 United States

Médecins Sans Frontières 2012 France

Hans Blix 2014 Sweden

Richard Lugar 2016 United States

Angela Merkel 2018 Germany

>Teh moar ewe gno…

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 6:55 p.m. No.15724947   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4977 >>4988 >>5053

>>15721527 (pb)Susan Eisenhower Links

>https://infogalactic.com/info/Nuclear_Threat_Initiative

Nuclear Threat Initiative

>This (old) dig uncovered a murder of swamp critters…

The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization founded in 2001 by Ted Turner and Sam Nunn in the United States, which exists to strengthen global security by reducing the spread of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and also to reduce the risk that they will actually be used.

In 2002, NTI provided the additional $5 million of private money needed (combined with $3 million from the US government) to safely move 48 kg ofhighly enriched uranium(enough for two nuclear weapons) from the defunct Vinca nuclear reactor near Belgrade to a facility in the Russian Federation to be blended down for use as a conventional nuclear fuel. Throughout this process the Initiative worked to secure these vulnerable materials from illicit use. I[1]

UN Security Council Resolution 1887 supported the WINS mission, calling for states to “share best practices with a view to improved safety standards and nuclear security practices and raise standards of nuclear security to reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism.”[4]

 

The Nuclear Threat Initiative serves as the Secretariat for the Nuclear Security Project, in cooperation with the Hoover Institution. Former Secretary of State George P. Shultz, former Secretary of Defense William J. Perry, former Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger and former Senator Sam Nunn guide the project—an effort to galvanize global action to reduce urgent nuclear dangers and build support for reducing reliance on nuclear weapons, ultimately ending them as a threat to the world.

NTI also has received international recognition for work toimprove biosecurity, primarily through creating disease surveillance networks. Whether a biological threat is natural or intentional, disease surveillance is a key step in rapid detection and response. Because the response of a health system in one country could have a direct and immediate impact on a neighboring country, or even continent, NTI developed projects that foster cooperation among public health officials across political and geographic boundaries. In 2003, NTI created the Middle East Consortium for Infectious Disease Surveillance (MECIDS) with participation from Israel, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority. Despite tensions in the region, MECIDS continues to share official health data and conduct infectious disease prevention training. NTI also created and nurturedConnecting Organizations for Disease Surveillance(CORDS), which in 2013 launched asindependent NGO that links international disease surveillance networks. Its work has received the support of both theWorld Health Organization, and the Food and Animal Organization of the United Nations.

>"disease surveillance networks"<

Anonymous ID: f482f9 Feb. 25, 2022, 7:04 p.m. No.15725014   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov4uHDqyHzI

President Nixon's Trip to China: Fifty Years Later

>173 views | Feb 25, 2022 | CFR

On the anniversary of President Nixon's February 1972 trip to China, our panelists examine the significance of the trip and its influence on U.S. foreign policy, how U.S.-China relations have fared in the fifty years since the visit, and the challenges ahead for the two countries.

 

The Lessons From History Series uses historical analysis as a critical tool for understanding modern foreign policy challenges by hearing from practitioners who played an important role in a consequential historical event or from experts and historians. This series is made possible through the generous support of David M. Rubenstein.

 

Speakers

 

Winston Lord

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Lord

Chairman Emeritus, International Rescue Committee; Former U.S. Ambassador to China (1985–1989); Former President, Council on Foreign Relations (1977–1985); Former Special Assistant to the National Security Advisor (1970–1973); CFR Member

 

Oriana Skylar Mastro

>https://fsi.stanford.edu/people/oriana-skylar-mastro

Center Fellow, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University; Senior Nonresident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute; Member, CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force on a U.S. Response to China's Belt and Road Initiative; CFR Term Member

 

Timothy Naftali

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Naftali

Clinical Associate Professor of History and Public Service, New York University; Coauthor, Impeachment: An American History; Founding Director, Richard Nixon Presidential Library

 

Presider

 

Douglas G. Brinkley

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Brinkley

Katherine Tsanoff Brown Chair in Humanities and Professor of History, Rice University; Coeditor, The Nixon Tapes; CFR Member