"The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital."
Here's a solution to this stringer: What if the truth would enrage the population so much that they'd go to hostpitals to LITERALLY KILL the staff?
Can you think of anything that would make people more angry than to learn that the medical industry has been intentionally sickening them?
"The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital."
Refining:
The truth would cause so much disruption to existing systems that the disruptions would end up putting 99% of the people in the hospital because the systems that keep 99% of the population alive wouldn't function.
I now believe this is the meaning behind that statemnent.
I agree. (I'm just trying to determine the meaning of that statement.)
It is true, however, that a slow roll (as we're seeing) is a more prudent approach if a major concern is systemic disruption. I agree in 100% disclosure, but I also believe that 100% disclosure all at once isn't the wisest way to do this.
The biggest thing I'm watching for is follow-through. If there isn't 100% follow through with this, then those who are fully aware are going to take matters into their own hands and that could be much uglier.
As I recall, Q said 40% public, 60% private. I'm not sure this means 60% classified. It may mean that 40% is promoted generally and [nearly all] of the remaining 60% is only available for those who actually read a book or do research.
Clearly, we know enough to really shock the fuck out of normies and the normies don't need to know all of it. I'm OK with only 40% being promoted as 'news' as long as [nearly all] of the remaining 60% is easily available to anyone who cares to look for it.
Concur.
Having 100% of the information doesn't necessarily help. For example, the identity of special operators who take out bad guy #4123. Just not necessary.
Also, Q didn't specify the parameters describing the spectrum described by the 100%, so it will never be 'known' without clarification.
I think in general, the idea is to get enough infomrmation out so this never happens again. This is the most important attribute I am vigilant to watch for. I've fought against this shit my entire life. If removal isn't complete, it isn't shit. However, you can have removal and 100% prevention without 100.0% disclosure.
That's all good and stuff, but remember that anyone without this understand (meaning most) who sees the GEOTUS used thinks you're an idiot. As this fans out into the normie population, the whole GEOTUS thing can be used as evidence that those who understand all of this are actually just blind Trump diety worshippers. Think about the consequences of it. IMO, it isn't necessary or helpful.
It is far more pervasive than that. Think about it. The only companies that are allowed to get big are those they control. You can't just shut down the system they control because you'd instantly put us into the dark ages.
Nice. I hate the entire tech industry.
Well, that link is a website that says he would be there. But do we have any way to know that he was there. This smells of something that was supposed to happen or could even be intentional misinformation to act as proof-of-freedom for people.
No video uploaded. No proof he was ever there. Just a tweet. I'm gonna say this was just covered.
You're misreading my intent. I'm in favor of slow-rolling it, but I'm also adamant about [nearly all] of the information being available for anyone interested enough to look for themselves. Additionally, enough should be taught/promoted to prevent it from ever happening again.
>I know it twice over. Still regrouping.
I'm sorry for your loss. I have also fought this my entire life. I've been able to outwit them to a large degree. Fun times. (/sarc)
AND NOW TO CRUSH THEIR FUCKING SKULLS.