This post misses the point. A coffee shop or a bar are not primarily means of personal expression and information sharing. In reality, Facebook or Twitter censorship is far more dangerous to open public discourse, especially when it is so easily concealed behind black box algorithms that it offers a much more dangerous potential damage to public speech and the ability of the public to participate in public discourse and politics.
BS… You go try and "compete" against a giant like FB or Twitter. Can it be done? Maybe… with Cabal Support, sure. Can it be done successfully by an independent startup? BS. FB is clearly a site at least partly created by the CIA, that makes it a part of the shadow government if not a part of the US government. I wouldn't be surprised if a similar history isn't hidden away about Twitter either…
Your argument is totally invalid.
You didn't back up anything, you made vague unsupported statements. There was no sauce there. The reality is that what you're saying is moon beam, pie-in-the-sky, fantasy land shit.
Yes, it's possible to build a better platform, more stable, more user friendly, etc. etc.
But without the user base or a way to attract the user base it would be incredibly difficult to take over from either of those two companies. In tech's past when major companies have fallen (e.g. Yahoo!, Blackberry) it has been from not effectively adapting to market trends and technology, not competition…
So, unless they make serious mistakes, small startup competitors have little chance of becoming more than niche markets.